: Doug Schepers [mailto:schep...@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:08 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Charles Pritchard; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices
Hi, Bryan-
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote (on 3/4/10 9:15 AM):
This might be better discussed
n Sullivan | AT&T
-Original Message-
From: Charles Pritchard [mailto:ch...@jumis.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 10:31 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Doug Schepers; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices
`
> On the main (or more useful) poin
> On the main (or more useful) point perhaps, I think the distinction
> between a device's internal features, its peripherals as attached
> features, and more abstracted (even remote) resources is still very
blurry
> between Webapps and DAP.
...
> Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
Perhaps the "System Infor
hed to it.
I'd like to see some clearer distinction between the charters on these points.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
-Original Message-
From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schep...@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:08 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Charles Pritchard;
Hi, Bryan-
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote (on 3/4/10 9:15 AM):
This might be better discussed by the DAP group, as it's clearly a
"device API" topic.
By that definition, a mouse would be a device. :) This work belongs in
the WebApps WG, and it is explicitly mentioned in our charter, to be
This might be better discussed by the DAP group, as it's clearly a
"device API" topic.
Also it would be interesting to hear from Apple and Wacom (without
unnecessary details at this point), what areas of touch interface
capabilities would be problematic for W3C to create API's for, from an
IPR per
Hi, Charles-
Indeed, there has already been some concrete discussion on this, and we
plan to take up work on such a specification in the next couple of
months. It's been explicitly included in our draft rechartering [1].
[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/#aide
Regards-
-Doug Schepe
