Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
-Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 May 2015 13:55 To: Andrew Twigger Cc: Marcos Caceres; Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the Implementers

RE: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-11 Thread Andrew Twigger
May 2015 13:55 To: Andrew Twigger Cc: Marcos Caceres; Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the Implementers ... statement from [NS] document, if that statement is removed, does that address your

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
[ + Marcos and Frederick ] Hi Andrew, The group stopped working on XML Digital Signature for Widgets several years ago and there is no plan to resume work (except to process errata as required). Marcos, Frederick - this spec's namespace document includes the following statement: [[

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems to be a rather theoretical discussion: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/SDK/High-Level_APIs/widget Anders regards,

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems to be a rather theoretical discussion:

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems to be a rather theoretical discussion:

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the Implementers ... statement from [NS] document, if that statement is removed, does that address your concern? -Thanks, ArtB [NS] http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets-digsig/ On 5/8/15 7:14 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: [ + Marcos and Frederick

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Friday, May 8, 2015, Anders Rundgren anders.rundgren@gmail.com wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it?

[widgets] implementation data [Was: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig]

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 5/8/15 8:52 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Friday, May 8, 2015, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: [ + Marcos and Frederick ] Hi Andrew, The group stopped working on XML Digital Signature for Widgets several years ago and there is no plan to resume work (except to process errata as required). Marcos, Frederick - this

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Frederick Hirsch
no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Chair XML Security WG fjhirsch.com @fjhirsch On May 8, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: [ + Marcos and Frederick ]