Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

2011-10-24 Thread Cameron McCormack 

Travis Leithead:

Is there a comment tracking doc for this LC (e.g., lc2)?


Art Barstow:

I don't see one in CVS. (I think Cameron returns soon though.)


I have begun tracking these comments now:

http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc2.txt

Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

2011-10-11 Thread Arthur Barstow 

On 9/27/11 3:56 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:

On September 27 a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL was published:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-WebIDL-20110927/

The deadline for comments is October 18 and all comments should be 
sent to:


public-script-co...@w3.org

The comment tracking doc for the previous LC is:

  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc1.txt

Cameron, Philippe - if you think it is necessary, please fwd this 
e-mail to ECMA TC39.


-AB

RE: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

2011-10-11 Thread Travis Leithead 
Is there a comment tracking doc for this LC (e.g., lc2)?

-Original Message-
From: public-script-coord-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-script-coord-
requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Barstow
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 4:37 AM
To: public-script-coord; public-webapps
Subject: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline
October 18

On 9/27/11 3:56 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
 On September 27 a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL was published:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-WebIDL-20110927/

 The deadline for comments is October 18 and all comments should be
 sent to:

 public-script-co...@w3.org

 The comment tracking doc for the previous LC is:

   http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc1.txt

 Cameron, Philippe - if you think it is necessary, please fwd this
 e-mail to ECMA TC39.

 -AB

Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

2011-10-11 Thread Arthur Barstow 

On 10/11/11 4:08 PM, ext Travis Leithead wrote:

Is there a comment tracking doc for this LC (e.g., lc2)?


I don't see one in CVS. (I think Cameron returns soon though.)

Re: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

2011-09-28 Thread Alex Russell 
I would, again, like to bring up the issue of non-constructable
constructors as the default in WebIDL. It is onerous to down-stream
authors to leave such a foot-gun in the spec if they're *expected* to
provide constructors for most classes (and this is JS we're talking
about, so they are) and it is hostile to web developers to implicitly
encourage this sort of brokenness with regards to the target language.

None of the arguments presented for non-constructable-ctors as the
default have substantively addressed WebIDL's responsibility to either
JS or to other spec authors, instead fobbing the requirements back
onto them.

Regards

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
 On September 27 a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL was published:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-WebIDL-20110927/

 The deadline for comments is October 18 and all comments should be sent to:

 public-script-co...@w3.org

 The comment tracking doc for the previous LC is:

  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc1.txt

 Cameron, Philippe - if you think it is necessary, please fwd this e-mail to
 ECMA TC39.

 -AB

RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18

2011-09-27 Thread Arthur Barstow 

On September 27 a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL was published:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-WebIDL-20110927/

The deadline for comments is October 18 and all comments should be sent to:

public-script-co...@w3.org

The comment tracking doc for the previous LC is:

  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/lc1.txt

Cameron, Philippe - if you think it is necessary, please fwd this e-mail 
to ECMA TC39.


-AB