Asking about use cases that can be served by a filesystem API, but not
by IDB, is reasonable [and I'll respond to it below], but it misses a
lot of the point. The users I've talked to like the FS API because
it's a simple interface that everyone already understands, that's
powerful enough to
On Sep 25, 2012, at 10:20 AM, James Graham jgra...@opera.com wrote:
In addition, this would be the fourth storage API that we have tried to
introduce to the platform in 5 years (localStorage, WebSQL, IndexedDB being
the other three), and the fifth in total. Of the four APIs excluding this
