On 17 Feb 2010, at 00:19, Harry Halpin wrote:
On 17 Feb 2010, at 00:19, Harry Halpin wrote:
Yes, we over in the Social Web XG would be happy to provide some space
where efforts like this one can be done, in particular a Social API
requirements telecon and e-mail discussion with WebApps would
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Doug Schepers schep...@w3.org wrote:
Hi, Scott-
This is certainly a valid aspect of Widgets... as a platform for a specific
kind of Web application: a collaboration/discussion/sharing app.
But it seems to me that this is conflating two orthogonal things: an
On Feb 13, 2010, at 5:18 PM, ext Scott Wilson wrote:
On 13 Feb 2010, at 20:52, Doug Schepers wrote:
That's not to say a Social API is not useful or desirable. I'd
love to see this done at W3C, and I think it's important to make
sure it works well in both web sites and widgets. So, my
Hi, Scott-
This is certainly a valid aspect of Widgets... as a platform for a
specific kind of Web application: a collaboration/discussion/sharing app.
But it seems to me that this is conflating two orthogonal things: an
application host environment, and a collaboration platform. Widgets
On 13 Feb 2010, at 20:52, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Scott-
This is certainly a valid aspect of Widgets... as a platform for a
specific kind of Web application: a collaboration/discussion/sharing
app.
But it seems to me that this is conflating two orthogonal things: an
application host
