Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
-Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 May 2015 13:55 To: Andrew Twigger Cc: Marcos Caceres; Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the Implementers

RE: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-11 Thread Andrew Twigger
May 2015 13:55 To: Andrew Twigger Cc: Marcos Caceres; Frederick Hirsch; public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig Andrew - seeing no objections from the group to removing the Implementers ... statement from [NS] document, if that statement is removed, does that address your

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
are not included in Widget DigSig. I would be pleased to receive any information regarding the stability of Widget DigSig and whether referencing XAdES would provide a better alternative. Thank-you, Andrew Twigger

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Anders Rundgren
would be to reference XAdES with the C and T forms to allow for the inclusion of timestamp and certificate revocation information which are not included in Widget DigSig. I would be pleased to receive any information regarding the stability of Widget DigSig and whether referencing XAdES would

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems to be a rather theoretical discussion:

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems to be a rather theoretical discussion:

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
. I would be pleased to receive any information regarding the stability of Widget DigSig and whether referencing XAdES would provide a better alternative. Thank-you, Andrew Twigger

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Friday, May 8, 2015, Anders Rundgren anders.rundgren@gmail.com wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it?

[widgets] implementation data [Was: Re: Stability of Widget DigSig]

2015-05-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 5/8/15 8:52 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:50, Arthur Barstow wrote: On 5/8/15 8:47 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote: On 2015-05-08 14:32, Frederick Hirsch wrote: no objection, the referenced document is a Recommendation, isn't it? http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ This seems

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Marcos Caceres
and T forms to allow for the inclusion of timestamp and certificate revocation information which are not included in Widget DigSig. I would be pleased to receive any information regarding the stability of Widget DigSig and whether referencing XAdES would provide a better alternative. Thank-you

Re: Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-08 Thread Frederick Hirsch
are not included in Widget DigSig. I would be pleased to receive any information regarding the stability of Widget DigSig and whether referencing XAdES would provide a better alternative. Thank-you, Andrew Twigger

Stability of Widget DigSig

2015-05-07 Thread Andrew Twigger
of timestamp and certificate revocation information which are not included in Widget DigSig. I would be pleased to receive any information regarding the stability of Widget DigSig and whether referencing XAdES would provide a better alternative. Thank-you, Andrew Twigger