URL bugs and next steps

2015-06-16 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
[resending with Anne and public-webapps. I was asked to add both and forgot. Apologizes for the omission] Things haven't been moving at fixing the bugs in the URL specification. Sam has circulated a list of issues but did not receive much feedback. I figured the best way to understand to make

Re: URL bugs and next steps

2015-06-16 Thread Philippe Le Hegaret
On 06/16/2015 10:33 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: Things haven't been moving at fixing the bugs in the URL specification. Sam has circulated a list of issues but did not receive much feedback. I figured the best way to

Re: URL bugs and next steps

2015-06-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: That's great but are we getting the implementations aligned? Yes, slowly. My understanding is that implementations are still differing from the spec and we weren't getting them to move. Reasons for that are differing

Re: URL bugs and next steps

2015-06-16 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret p...@w3.org wrote: Things haven't been moving at fixing the bugs in the URL specification. Sam has circulated a list of issues but did not receive much feedback. I figured the best way to understand to make progress would be to have a call so

RE: URL bugs and next steps

2015-06-16 Thread Domenic Denicola
[+Sebastian] From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@annevk.nl] the state of the specification and testsuite. Worth pointing out, since I guess it hasn't been publicized beyond IRC: as part of the jsdom project [1] (which is a hobby of mine), Sebastian has been working on a reference