Re: Widget testing
Hi Kai! On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Kai Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, I have an action to tell you what I've been upto WRT widgets http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action02 I've started working one day a week on widget testing. My own git repo is here: http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa and it will move to a W3C CVS soon. I've come across a couple of issues which I've mailed Marcos already about. Though I'll paste them in here just in case: Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-license Having a optional URI or href whatever for the license would be good. Seems to be some inconsistency between src, uri, url, href btw that you can easily pick up in the relaxng scheme. I'm not comfortable with adding an optional URI. It implies that a license could change on the web without the user knowing about it. That really concerns me. http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-author xml:lang is not needed and it's not in your relaxng schema besides. Yep. The schema will only be updated once we finish spec'ing. I don't want to waste David's time updating the schema when the spec is still changing. I might remove the schema all together till we get to last call. It causes too much confusion at this point because it is maintained independently of the spec. Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget0 Bit confused by its:dir on widget, name, description, author etc. Can you describe the confusion? What should I put into the spec to make things more clear? The RelaxNG compact schema uses the bdo element and so does HTML5 so can't we just rock with that? http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa;a=blob;f=widget.rnc As above. I've also written a little widget validation tool, which uses my updated (probably wrong) schema (widget.rnc). Try foo.wgt out like so: curl -F [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wgt.webvm.net/ Great! If you have any comments or you'd like to help us out over at http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/Tests/ then please get in touch. I'm also on IRC as 'hendry'. Enjoy the weekend, Thanks for your help Kai! -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Re: Widget testing
On 24 Nov 2008, at 22:46, Marcos Caceres wrote: Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-license Having a optional URI or href whatever for the license would be good. Seems to be some inconsistency between src, uri, url, href btw that you can easily pick up in the relaxng scheme. I'm not comfortable with adding an optional URI. It implies that a license could change on the web without the user knowing about it. That really concerns me. It's not that uncommon to use URIs to identify (well-known) licenses, see, e.g., http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-ccREL-20080501/ http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4946.txt I'd suggest that it's a good idea to enable this pattern for widgets; the issue that you point out (licenses changing after the fact) is one that's being dealt with on a social level. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Widget testing
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24 Nov 2008, at 22:46, Marcos Caceres wrote: Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-license Having a optional URI or href whatever for the license would be good. Seems to be some inconsistency between src, uri, url, href btw that you can easily pick up in the relaxng scheme. I'm not comfortable with adding an optional URI. It implies that a license could change on the web without the user knowing about it. That really concerns me. It's not that uncommon to use URIs to identify (well-known) licenses, see, e.g., http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-ccREL-20080501/ http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4946.txt I'd suggest that it's a good idea to enable this pattern for widgets; the issue that you point out (licenses changing after the fact) is one that's being dealt with on a social level. Grumble, grumble... alright, I'll add it... but I still don't like it :) -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Widget testing
Hey guys, I have an action to tell you what I've been upto WRT widgets http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action02 I've started working one day a week on widget testing. My own git repo is here: http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa and it will move to a W3C CVS soon. I've come across a couple of issues which I've mailed Marcos already about. Though I'll paste them in here just in case: Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-license Having a optional URI or href whatever for the license would be good. Seems to be some inconsistency between src, uri, url, href btw that you can easily pick up in the relaxng scheme. http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-author xml:lang is not needed and it's not in your relaxng schema besides. Subject: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget0 Bit confused by its:dir on widget, name, description, author etc. The RelaxNG compact schema uses the bdo element and so does HTML5 so can't we just rock with that? http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa;a=blob;f=widget.rnc I've also written a little widget validation tool, which uses my updated (probably wrong) schema (widget.rnc). Try foo.wgt out like so: curl -F [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wgt.webvm.net/ If you have any comments or you'd like to help us out over at http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/Tests/ then please get in touch. I'm also on IRC as 'hendry'. Enjoy the weekend,
