Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget-element height and width default values

2009-01-17 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Kai, On 1/14/09 4:06 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" wrote: > > Kai Hendry wrote: >> Was wondering how you came up with 150x300 as the default size for a widget. > > Possibly because that's the default size of a replaced element in CSS? > And that's because that's how big iframes are by default in br

Re: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget-element height and width default values

2009-01-14 Thread Boris Zbarsky
Kai Hendry wrote: Was wondering how you came up with 150x300 as the default size for a widget. Possibly because that's the default size of a replaced element in CSS? And that's because that's how big iframes are by default in browsers, last I checked. Perhaps pixel definitions are scalabl

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget-element height and width default values

2009-01-14 Thread Kai Hendry
"Suggestion" for http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#the-widget-element When the value is missing "or invalid", the widget user agent will assume the value 300. And perhaps reference http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/#step-3-set-the-configuration-defaults Was wondering how you came up with 150