Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example)

2010-03-27 Thread Felix Sasaki
The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute, e.g. at elem.author = element author { attr.xmllang?, attr.itsdir?, attribute href { xsd:anyURI }?,

Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example)

2010-03-27 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Mar 27, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Felix Sasaki felix.sas...@fh-potsdam.de wrote: The spec itself looks fine. It seems that the schema at http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-schema/widgets.rnc is not up to date yet. It still contains the *ITS* dir attribute, e.g. at elem.author = element

i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example)

2010-03-26 Thread Richard Ishida
[Changing the subject to keep the review comment thread clean] Personally, I think we're ok with the changes. RI Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/International/ http://rishida.net/ -Original Message- From: