ISSUE-4 Re: New Progress Events draft

2008-10-21 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:48:07 +0200, Jonas Sicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles McCathieNevile wrote: ... http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24 you will find a new draft of the progress events spec, for your delectation... So the spec says

Re: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total

2008-10-21 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:25:34 +0200, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISSUE-37: [Progress] Use unsigned long long for .loaded and .total http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/ Raised by: Olli Pettay On product: Since Progress Events is used also

Re: Transitioning to a new position!

2008-10-21 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:24:21 +0200, Sunava Dutta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fellow Web Apps and HTML 5.0 friends, I'm going to be transitioning to a new position in the Biz-Dev team over at Windows Live starting Monday the 13th. Sunava, I hope the new job is going well (if not, we are

Re: ISSUE-38: DOM 3 Events abort/error bubble, ProgressEvent abort/error do not [Progress Events]

2008-10-21 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:51:59 +0200, Olli Pettay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Or 4. Leave things as they currently are specified. Which is what I have done for now - but I will explicitly note that in the next draft. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards

New Progress draft (1.25)...

2008-10-21 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24 Hopefully this draft is ready for last call. So please have a look through it, and if you have any test cases we can set up I would be very grateful (as would anyone trying to test something as a way of figuring

Re: [access-control] Seeking Clarification and Status of Issues #25, #26, #29, #30, #31 and #32

2008-10-21 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:13:50 +0200, Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the information Jonas. Anne - Jonas indicates #26, #29, #31 and #32 have been addressed in the latest Editor's Draft. Thus an implication they can be closed. Do you agree they have been addressed and

[widgets] Minutes from 20 October 2008 f2f meeting

2008-10-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the October 20 Widgets f2f meeting are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2008/10/20-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before October 23 (next Widgets

[widgets] Minutes from 21 October f2f meeting

2008-10-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the October 21 Widgets f2f meeting are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before October 23 (next Widgets

Re: New Progress draft (1.25)...

2008-10-21 Thread Garrett Smith
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.24 Hopefully this draft is ready for last call. So please