On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:21:09 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
this is a call for consensus to move the Selectors API [1] to Candidate
Recommendation,
Opera supports publishing this spec as a CR - and if we can get a test
suite and interop report in
Hi Marcos,
Many thanks for the thorough feedback - I'm glad the comments were
useful.
Some quick responses below for the editorial comments (marked [mp]). I
will address your other comments in the next couple of days.
Thanks again,
Mark
---
6
On Feb 4, 2009, at 20:05 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
Yep. But like Charles said, it should be the other way around: Bondi
specs should be brought to the W3C for standardization once they are
ready. If the specs are done, implemented, and have an associated
test-suite, then standardization through
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:21:09 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile cha...@opera.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
this is a call for consensus to move the Selectors API [1] to Candidate
Recommendation, following the end of the last call.
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/
One minor fix:
Apologies for entering thread late.
To clarify: BONDI work would have been introduced to W3C activity
earlier in the process, however, we have been fighting the internal (and
cross organisational) processes surrounding IPR regimes.
This is now fully clarified - and formal inputs will be
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 20:05 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
Yep. But like Charles said, it should be the other way around: Bondi
specs should be brought to the W3C for standardization once they are
ready. If the specs are done,
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org
Date: February 5, 2009 3:05:02 PM EST
To: public-device-a...@w3.org public-device-a...@w3.org
Subject: Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web: Workshop
Report Published
Archived-At:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:07:08 -0500, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com
wrote:
WebApps WG Members - this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish
the Element Traversal errata as proposed by Cameron:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/
0168.html
As with
Hi Kartikaya.
Kartikaya Gupta:
I just noticed that the java binding file has a link to ww.w3.org
instead of www.w3.org.
Well spotted! I committed an updated ElementTraversal-java-binding.zip
file.
Thanks,
Cameron
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
So do I, and most likely the rest of mozilla.
/ Jonas
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Charles McCathieNevile cha...@opera.com wrote:
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:21:09 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
this is a call for consensus to move the Selectors API [1] to
Charles McCathieNevile:
this is a call for consensus to move the Selectors API [1] to Candidate
Recommendation, following the end of the last call.
+1
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
11 matches
Mail list logo