On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:45:17 +0100, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3...@att.com wrote:
Hi Charles,
I have an agenda item for the AOB section or wherever it can fit. I will
be spending most of the time with DAP and part with Webapps (Widgets),
but will try to balance the agendas to be in
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:11:23 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
there is a proposed timeline at
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TPAC2009APIs#Agenda_Items
...
I am extremely interested in the CORS discussion, and I
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 4:09 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
Hi folks,
there is a proposed timeline at
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/TPAC2009APIs#Agenda_Items
Please have a look, and if you think your input is important for any session
but you will be in a different
Arun Ranganathan wrote:
The latest revision of the FileAPI editor's draft is available here:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/
...
4. A suggestion to *not* have a separate scheme (filedata:) in lieu of
urn:uuid:uuid[2] has been the basis of a rewrite of that feature in
this version of
On Oct 29, 2009, at 08:38 , Jonas Sicking wrote:
Regarding the joint session with DAP; The filesystem spec seems... how
should I say this politely.. to be lacking details. In fact, I can't
find a single thing it defines. Normatively or informatively. :)
Is it expected to get some more meat on
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:43:15 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:11:23 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
there is a proposed timeline at
On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:19 AM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 07:43:15 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:11:23 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com
wrote:
On Oct 27, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
there is
If we have time and interest, I suggest we might also discuss in the
joint DAP/WebApps Widgets session HTML5 security model, even if we
also discuss in the joint DAP/WebApps API session, depending on the
expertise in the room.
I would like to make sure we transfer understanding to the DAP
Apache Wookie got 2 that failed, and the rest couldn't run - I think
because WindowWidget is not required for all UAs to conform, but is
required as a prerequisite by the test.
After some tweaking I got some slightly more useful results... so its
definitely a start!
We've been using this
The draft minutes from the October 29 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2009/10/29-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before 12 November 2009
Hi,
As discussed on the webapps call, in addition to Fredrick's proposal I
think we need to understand the relationship between DAP / Widgets /
WebApps / HTML5 more clearly. There are overlaps and architectural
disparities which we should highlight and come up with a plan for
dealing with. Would
David
Would it be possible for you to summarize what you think the issue is,
as far as architecture and technical disparities, as a first step?
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:54 AM, ext David Rogers wrote:
Hi,
As discussed on the webapps call, in
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:54 AM, ext David Rogers wrote:
As discussed on the webapps call, in addition to Fredrick's proposal I
think we need to understand the relationship between DAP / Widgets /
WebApps / HTML5 more clearly. There are overlaps and architectural
disparities which we should
LOL, I wasn't expecting me to do the legwork for you all :-) One example
would be FileSystem in DAP and the File API in webapps. How do these two
fit together? I only saw an email on thoughts/assumptions about this
recently. To the outside observer, it is not easy to see what the
differences are
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:18:31 +0100, David Rogers david.rog...@omtp.org
wrote:
LOL, I wasn't expecting me to do the legwork for you all :-) One example
would be FileSystem in DAP and the File API in webapps. How do these two
fit together? I only saw an email on thoughts/assumptions about this
Hi,
So of course that was one example and I'm trying not to get into detail here -
my main point is that currently we have no big picture view, I don't think that
is good enough. This is why I want to put a specific agenda point forward for
the following:
I think a key output of TPAC for
Howdy, folks.
I'm a new guy on Google's Chrome team, having just moved
over from O3D. I'm interested in talking about the stuff
that's not going to make it into the current iteration of
the file API you've been discussing. Following Arun's
suggestion [1], I thought I'd post some use cases to
17 matches
Mail list logo
