Re: Mutation events replacement

2011-08-04 Thread Olli Pettay
Hi all, here is a bit different proposal for mutation events replacement. This is using the mostly-sync approach, and batching can make it easier to use with several simultaneous script libraries; each one would use their own batch. For performance reasons it might be useful to have an

Re: Mutation events replacement

2011-08-04 Thread Olli Pettay
/** * The name of the attribute which was changed, or null. */ readonly attribute DOMString attrName; There should be probably also attribute namespace void batchAttrChanges(in Node aNode); A filter could be added here -void batchAttrChanges(in Node aNode); +void batchAttrChanges(in Node

Re: [IndexedDB] Transaction Auto-Commit

2011-08-04 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Aug 4, 2011 12:28 AM, Joran Greef jo...@ronomon.com wrote: On 03 Aug 2011, at 7:33 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: Note that reads are also blocked if the long-running transaction is a READ_WRITE transaction. Is it acceptable for a writer to block readers? What if one tab is downloading a

Re: publish new WD of DOM Core; deadline August 10

2011-08-04 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote: The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is now causing problems. I've had multiple people contact me confused about this. We should fix the problem. Alright, how about DOM4? This

Re: Mutation events replacement

2011-08-04 Thread Olli Pettay
On 08/04/2011 10:14 PM, David Flanagan wrote: On 8/4/11 6:38 AM, Olli Pettay wrote: Hi all, here is a bit different proposal for mutation events replacement. This is using the mostly-sync approach, and batching can make it easier to use with several simultaneous script libraries; each one

[Bug 13063] MessagePort normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13063 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13065] WindowTimers normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13065 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13064] WindowBase64 normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13064 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13083] postMessage should have an optional parameter for a synchronous request. Cross-domain AJAX calls are enough of a problem that it merits a supported way of fixing it, and this could be it

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13083 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13020] No user agent will implement the storage mutex so this passage does not reflect reality

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13020 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13155] The security considerations section needs to be updated to take CORS into account.

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13155 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13156] The charset parameter is now an optional parameter (even though it can only be set to UTF-8). That should probably be stated here.

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13156 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13063] MessagePort normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13063 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 13064] WindowBase64 normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13064 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

Re: Element.create(): a proposal for more convenient element creation

2011-08-04 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:31:04 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org

[Bug 13071] Once the end of the file is reached, the user agent must dispatch the event one final time, as defined below means an implementation may parse a partial (corrupt) event as a final even

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13172] The definition for [MessageEvent] is missing.

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13172 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 13064] WindowBase64 normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13064 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED

Re: CfC: publish new WD of DOM Core; deadline August 10

2011-08-04 Thread Jonas Sicking
I support this. On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Anne would like to publish a new WD of DOM Core and this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to do so:  http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html Agreeing with this proposal: a) indicates

[Bug 13065] WindowTimers normatively referenced by not defined

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13065 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 13229] The following text from the Security considerations part of 11 IANA considerations is wrong: An event stream from an origin distinct from the origin of the content consuming the eve

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13229 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: publish new WD of DOM Core; deadline August 10

2011-08-04 Thread David Flanagan
On 8/4/11 12:21 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:06:58 +0200, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com wrote: The name was changed. We weren't terribly keen on the change. It is now causing problems. I've had multiple people contact me confused about this. We should fix the

[Bug 13678] New: Misleading encoding in FormData objects created on HTML Forms

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13678 Summary: Misleading encoding in FormData objects created on HTML Forms Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 13681] New: Make FormData.append return the FormData object

2011-08-04 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13681 Summary: Make FormData.append return the FormData object Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

Re: Element.create(): a proposal for more convenient element creation

2011-08-04 Thread Garrett Smith
On 8/4/11, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:31:04 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 2,