On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 02:40:29 +0200, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Like Cameron says in the link above and based on the WebIDL description,
it seems we want the IndexedDB text to say, for example:
Throws a DOMException of type VersionError. (vs. Throw a VersionError
exception)
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13410
Anne ann...@opera.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public-webapps@w3.org
On Sep 27, 2011, at 01:43 , Jonas Sicking wrote:
Please don't use errorCallback/SuccessCallback. That's not used in any
other APIs that are part of the cross-browser web platform. Instead
return a request object on which events are fired.
Except for, you know, Geolocation. I don't know that we
Tab: How well is display: transparent received, eg on www-style?
I have a feeling this question—whether to render the host or not—depends on
whether you are using shadow DOM with components, or with existing elements.
When you want to use shadow DOM with components, the current solution seems
OK
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Kinuko Yasuda kin...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to confirm: Yes the interfaces are vendor prefixed (WebKit), and
WebSQL, AppCache, IDB are treated as temporary in the current chromium
implementation.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Charles Pritchard
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14297
Ms2ger ms2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
WebEvents WG has proposed a charter revision that includes Mouse Lock:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011JulSep/0087.html
Also, Minor update to spec:
0.71, 2011-09-27
Preventing malicious 'click jacking' behavior has been curtailed by
requiring the target of mouse lock
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
With this understanding, and having not noticed any objections to Aryeh's
proposal, I think we should consider Aryeh's proposal as accepted.
Thank you. I've updated the spec and will use this list accordingly
in the
On September 27 a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL was published:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-WebIDL-20110927/
The deadline for comments is October 18 and all comments should be sent to:
public-script-co...@w3.org
The comment tracking doc for the previous LC is:
http://dev.w3.org/2006
Hi,
If I understand correctly you are planing to allow shadow dom to be styled by
users stylesheets.
I’m not sure it will be a good idea since it would break encapsulation.
Regards,
Julien
On 09/24/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Klein wrote:
For each observer, if a registration exists which requests the
matching mutation type and whose observed node set contains the target
node of the mutation, a MutationRecord is appended to the observer's
pending mutation queue. If multiple such
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
The upcoming TPAC meeting (Oct 31 - Nov 01) provides an opportunity for
joint WG meetings and lots of informal sharing. As such, some groups make
spec publications right before TPAC.
Note there is a 2-week
On 9/27/2011 9:43 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Kinuko Yasudakin...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to confirm: Yes the interfaces are vendor prefixed (WebKit), and
WebSQL, AppCache, IDB are treated as temporary in the current chromium
implementation.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 9/27/2011 9:43 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Kinuko Yasudakin...@chromium.org
wrote:
Just to confirm: Yes the interfaces are vendor prefixed (WebKit), and
WebSQL, AppCache, IDB are
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Sunday, September 04, 2011 3:33 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I finally got around to updating the IndexedDB spec to the new version
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14318
Summary: Importance of the upgradeneeded event should be more
explicit
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
On 9/27/11 4:13 PM, Eric U wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Arthur Barstowart.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
The upcoming TPAC meeting (Oct 31 - Nov 01) provides an opportunity for
joint WG meetings and lots of informal sharing. As such, some groups make
spec publications right before TPAC.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com
wrote:
On Sunday, September 04, 2011 3:33 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Hi Everyone,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I agree
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14322
Summary: Update URL of the WebSocket protocol
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
[...]
We have an opportunity now to document the sub-elements of single form
controls.
That is certainly a very valid goal. For example, it would really be great
if an author could create his/her own video element and
21 matches
Mail list logo
