[XHR2] Streamed send or receive

2011-10-06 Thread Wenbo Zhu
I'd like to hear from the WG if the following use cases or issues have been discussed before. 1) When onreadystatechange is invoked as new response data is being received, currently there is no way to clear any buffered responseText (alike) that has already been consumed. The lack of such a

Re: [XHR2] Streamed send or receive

2011-10-06 Thread Wenbo Zhu
Sorry, the API for 2) should read: SendPartialRequest(). On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote: I'd like to hear from the WG if the following use cases or issues have been discussed before. 1) When onreadystatechange is invoked as new response data is being

Re: [XHR2] Streamed send or receive

2011-10-06 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote: I'd like to hear from the WG if the following use cases or issues have been discussed before. 1) When onreadystatechange is invoked as new response data is being received, currently there is no way to clear any buffered

Re: XBL2 is dead.

2011-10-06 Thread Alex Russell
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote: On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 20:30:24 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote: Further, instead of packaging Web Components into one omnibus offering, we will likely end up with several free-standing specs or spec

[Bug 14395] New: asd asasd asda dasd as d

2011-10-06 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14395 Summary: asd asasd asda dasd as d Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top OS/Version: other

[Bug 14396] New: ddfsdfsdf sdf fdsgshdf vjlh fjhvkjds hkjdfh jdsgfvslhjfdvhd

2011-10-06 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14396 Summary: ddfsdfsdf sdf fdsgshdf vjlh fjhvkjds hkjdfh jdsgfvslhjfdvhd Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL:

Re: Joint meeting of the CSS/WebApps/WebFonts WGs

2011-10-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
[ + WebAppSec WG ] I included the WebAppSec WG since CORS is now a joint deliverable of WebApps and WebAppSec. (CORS is generically named Secure Cross-Domain Resource Sharing in their charter [1].) If we are going to have a joint meeting, I have a strong preference for October 31. WebApps

Re: Generic guide to exceptions, events, etc. for new APIs Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB

2011-10-06 Thread Marcos Caceres
On Monday, October 3, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: (generally speaking...) Seems there is a lot of confusion about how to do this properly (and I'm seeing that this is going to now be an issue amongst a number of groups, including this group, DAP, and even other

Re: Generic guide to exceptions, events, etc. for new APIs Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB

2011-10-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 10/6/11 12:16 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: On Monday, October 3, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: (generally speaking...) Seems there is a lot of confusion about how to do this properly (and I'm seeing that this is going to now be an issue amongst a number of groups, including

RE: Joint meeting of the CSS/WebApps/WebFonts WGs

2011-10-06 Thread Levantovsky, Vladimir
Thank you Art, Oct. 31 at 11:00 - 12:00 would work fine for WebFonts WG. Best regards, Vladimir -Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 12:14 PM To: Levantovsky, Vladimir Cc: Linss, Peter; Daniel Glazman;

RE: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions

2011-10-06 Thread Israel Hilerio
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 3:01 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Israel Hilerio isra...@microsoft.com wrote: Based on previous conversations, it seems we've agreed that there are

[Bug 13584] [web messaging] Channel Messaging Origins

2011-10-06 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13584 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug 13584] [web messaging] Channel Messaging Origins

2011-10-06 Thread bugzilla
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13584 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson i...@hixie.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction

2011-10-06 Thread Jonas Sicking
Hi All, In both the Firefox and the Chrome implementation you can pass an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction in order to create a transaction which has a scope that covers all objectStores in the database. I.e. you can do something like: trans = db.transaction([]); trans.objectStore(any