On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Yehuda Katz wyc...@gmail.com wrote:
In the past year or so, I've participated in a number of threads that were
implicitly about adding features to browsers that would shrink the size of
existing libraries.
Inevitably, those discussions end up litigating
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote:
I think it's a great idea. Shipping less code over the wire seems like
a win from any perspective.
How about a cross-site secure (even pre-compiled) cache for JS
libraries as well? We almost have this with CDN now,
So how to take this forward?
My #1 priority is to get WebGL in workers. Lots of developers have
expressed a need for this from decoding compressed textures in a worker to
offloading thousands of draw calls per frame to a worker. WebGL already
defines sharing mechanisms so at least for the WebGL
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Gregg Tavares (勤) g...@google.com wrote:
So how to take this forward?
My #1 priority is to get WebGL in workers. Lots of developers have expressed
a need for this from decoding compressed textures in a worker to offloading
thousands of draw calls per frame to
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Gregg Tavares (勤) g...@google.com
wrote:
So how to take this forward?
My #1 priority is to get WebGL in workers. Lots of developers have
expressed
a need for this from decoding
Ok. I think I'm convinced on all points.
I've uploaded a webkit patch which implements what we've agreed on here:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84646
I'm happy to report that this patch is nicer than the queued-token
approach. Good call, Henri.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Yehuda
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Gregg Tavares (勤) g...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Gregg Tavares (勤) g...@google.com
wrote:
So how to take this forward?
My #1 priority is to get WebGL in
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote:
Ok. I think I'm convinced on all points.
I've uploaded a webkit patch which implements what we've agreed on here:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84646
I'm happy to report that this patch is nicer than the
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote:
Ok. I think I'm convinced on all points.
I've uploaded a webkit patch which implements what we've agreed on here:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Rafael Weinstein rafa...@google.com wrote:
Ok. I think I'm convinced on all points.
I've uploaded a webkit patch
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Gregg Tavares (勤) g...@google.com wrote:
Some Ideas
**) Create context in main page, pass to worker*
Transferring an active context from one thread to another (at the
implementation level) can be hard. It's much simpler to only create new
the contexts in the
In principle, I agree with this as a valid goal. It's one among many
though, so the devil is in the details of each specific proposal to balance
out this goal with others (e.g. keeping the platform consistent). I'd love
to see your list of proposals of what it would take to considerably shrink
12 matches
Mail list logo
