https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24704
Aryeh Gregor a...@aryeh.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
(bcc'ing SysApps and WebApps)
Hi,
Over the last week, the WebMob IG did a somewhat large study of installable web
apps based on iOS.
In the hope that the findings help with standardization of the manifest, I'd
like to share the findings and some recommendations with the WGs.
If you would
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
Yeah, I think we just say that [form.elements] is the legacy feature
that only exposes built-in controls. form.getParticipants() works for
me.
Agreed. [form.elements]
On Feb 20, 2014, at 6:29 PM, Hajime Morrita morr...@google.com wrote:
Firefox has already shipped style scoped without Shadow DOM and I guess
there is no dependency from scoped style to shadow DOM as the former is done
before the later is started.
Looks like Firefox supports it since 21.
On Feb 20, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
We could even make the built-in form controls like input and
select have a .formData() function which returns data in whatever
format we decide is the right one.
Right. toFormData() or the like, parallel to toJSON().
Do
On Feb 21, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
Yeah, I think we just say that [form.elements] is the legacy feature
that only exposes built-in controls.
On Feb 20, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
+public-webapps, -www-tag in replies to avoid cross-posting
Hi,
Domenic wrote, to www-tag:
[C]an shadow DOM be used to explain existing
From: Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com
What if we added formparticipant boolean content attribute and fired
formdata event during form submission to serialize data?
I don't understand the virtue of this inverted model, where controls are
responsible for listening to their containing form and
Hi,
Ryosuke wrote:
What if we added formparticipant boolean content attribute and fired
formdata event during form submission to serialize data?
This way, we can add more events like validate to support more
features of builtin form elements.
Hmm, right, validation. In the model I have in
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I'd guess most sophisticated webapps do not use attribute-based event
handlers (as opposed to addEventListener), so they would not get this
convenient scoping benefit.
That's not
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I'd guess most sophisticated webapps do not use attribute-based event
handlers (as opposed to addEventListener), so they would not get this
convenient scoping benefit.
That's not clear to me. I mean, certainly today, with div soup, they
don't.
On Feb 21, 2014, at 2:28 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I'd guess most sophisticated webapps do not use attribute-based event
handlers (as opposed to addEventListener), so they would not get this
convenient scoping benefit.
That's
On Feb 21, 2014, at 2:12 PM, Edward O'Connor eocon...@apple.com wrote:
Ryosuke wrote:
What if we added formparticipant boolean content attribute and fired
formdata event during form submission to serialize data?
This way, we can add more events like validate to support more
features of
13 matches
Mail list logo
