Re: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification

2014-04-11 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
I've uploaded the first cut the selection API specification unofficial draft at https://github.com/rniwa/selection-api I've modernized and rephrased the text; e.g. the spec refers to browsing context instead of defaultView, and defines selection's range being null as being empty. Finally,

RE: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification

2014-04-11 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rn...@apple.com] Given defining innerText is completely outside the scope of the selection API specification, we might need to defer this part to a level 2 specification since the only alternative is to wait for someone to write a innerText spec. I don't know all

Re: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification

2014-04-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 4/10/14 11:41 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote: I've uploaded the first cut the selection API specification unofficial draft at https://github.com/rniwa/selection-api Wow, that was quick; thanks! To facilitate review, I think it would be helpful if you would please create a `directly readable`

CfC: publish FPWD of Service Workers; deadline April 18

2014-04-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
Alex and Jungkee propose WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft of Service Workers and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following Editor's Draft as the basis: http://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/ This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to

Re: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification

2014-04-11 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
Done: http://rniwa.github.io/selection-api.html On Apr 11, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: On 4/10/14 11:41 PM, ext Ryosuke Niwa wrote: I've uploaded the first cut the selection API specification unofficial draft at https://github.com/rniwa/selection-api Wow,

[Bug 25329] New: Do not allow locking to angles

2014-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25329 Bug ID: 25329 Summary: Do not allow locking to angles Product: WebAppsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

Spec'ing innerText (Was Re: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification)

2014-04-11 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Apr 11, 2014, at 7:09 AM, Domenic Denicola dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote: From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rn...@apple.com] Given defining innerText is completely outside the scope of the selection API specification, we might need to defer this part to a level 2 specification since

[Bug 25314] screen.orientation.angle should be an unsigned short

2014-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25314 Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Service Workers; deadline April 18

2014-04-11 Thread Daniel Appelquist
On 11/04/2014 08:44, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Alex and Jungkee propose WebApps publish a First Public Working Draft of Service Workers and this is a Call for Consensus to do so, using the following Editor's Draft as the basis:

[Bug 25053] Specify clear security requirements

2014-04-11 Thread bugzilla
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25053 Mounir Lamouri mou...@lamouri.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[April2014Meeting] Draft minutes for April 11

2014-04-11 Thread Yves Lafon
The Draft minutes from WebApps' April 11 f2f meeting are at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2014/04/11-webapps-minutes.html Corrections, comments, etc., are welcome. Thanks very much to the various scribes and special thanks to Kris for handing me the missing minutes. W3C

Re: [Editing] Splitting Selection API Into a Separate Specification

2014-04-11 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 4/11/14 10:09 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: - https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 - https://web.archive.org/web/20121127212525/http://aryeh.name/spec/innertext/innertext.html The outcome of that was basically that the WebKit folks wanted innerText to be some sort of