Thanks. Apparently I did a lousy job of searching for previous discussions.
I just found this later, longer thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011OctDec/0965.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/0678.html
(same thread, different year, so
Le 09/08/2014 15:51, Alan deLespinasse a écrit :
Thanks. Apparently I did a lousy job of searching for previous
discussions.
I just found this later, longer thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011OctDec/0965.html
On Aug 9, 2014 10:16 AM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 09/08/2014 15:51, Alan deLespinasse a écrit :
Thanks. Apparently I did a lousy job of searching for previous
discussions.
I just found this later, longer thread:
[Cross-posting the comments below per Janina's thoughtful request.]
I concur with Janina's insightful remark [at the Indie-UI teleconference on
Thursday] that the explainer could evolve into a (potentially cross-group)
requirements document. This raises several issues.
1. Harmonization of