Can we perhaps not post ACTION-creation emails to the list?
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
The minutes from the October 27 f2f meeting are at the following and
copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2014/10/27-webapps-minutes.html
If anyone wants any major corrections, please speak up.
Thanks to all the Scribes: Josh, Natasha, Yves, Chaals, Travis and
anyone else who helped.
-Thanks,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:58:03PM -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:20 AM, rekt...@voodoowarez.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:28:41AM -0700, Martin Thomson wrote:
On 27 October 2014 08:42, rekt...@voodoowarez.com wrote:
Anyone who wants to implement a
On 10/27/14 12:06 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
We should have a plan for the bugzilla component (there are some good future
bugs logged there). Would the bugzilla component stay open?
I recommend it be marked Historical and closed to new bugs (like we
have done for other specs we have stopped
Hi All,
We need someone to lead or help with the IME API testing effort:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ime-api/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
If you can make a commitment, please let me know.
-Thanks, ArtB
On 10/27/14 9:59 AM, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
ACTION-740: Issue a call
Hi Tina, Zhiqiang,
During WebApps' Oct 27 meeting, we looked at the latest SSE results that
Zhiqiang gathered [1] and Robin noted:
[[
http://www.w3.org/2014/10/27-webapps-minutes.html#item16
darobin: Looks like there are some major timeout failures.
... timeout could be a test failure, but
These are created automatically by the tracker, and the create a new
action web form doesn't let you insert context until after the action is
created.
On 10/28/14, 2:47 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
Can we perhaps not post ACTION-creation emails to the list?
--
Hello,
Thanks Arthur for distributing the meeting minutes.
Concerning the Push API and service workers, I have a few comments on
the incoming call scenario:
1. Dialer apps (and eventually users) should be able to configure a
delay (e.g. 1-3 seconds) between first presenting the visual, then the
There was interest in the room at TPAC at making this a new unique spec
deliverable under webapps.
Ryosuke: See also: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13145
-Original Message-
From: Ryosuke Niwa [mailto:rn...@apple.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 7:28 PM
To:
[re-sent with corrected subject line]
Hello,
Concerning the Push API and service workers, I have a few comments on
the incoming call scenario:
1. Dialer apps (and eventually users) should be able to configure a
delay (e.g. 1-3 seconds) between first presenting the visual, then the
audible
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
There was interest in the room at TPAC at making this a new unique spec
deliverable under webapps.
A single specifiation for innerText? Or the underlying primitive that
is also required for text selection?
On Oct 28, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
There was interest in the room at TPAC at making this a new unique spec
deliverable under webapps.
A single specifiation for
WebApps-ACTION-756: Make sure webapps has good communication flow with indieui
group re editing
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/756
Assigned to: Charles McCathie Nevile
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24477
Takeshi Yoshino tyosh...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24479
Takeshi Yoshino tyosh...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=23900
Takeshi Yoshino tyosh...@google.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
16 matches
Mail list logo
