https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27418
Bug ID: 27418
Summary: [Shadow]: Need to define what .styleSheets actually
does on a shadow root
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27420
Bug ID: 27420
Summary: [Custom]: need a hook for transfering data while
cloning elements
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24338
Arun a...@mozilla.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27420
Adam Klein ad...@chromium.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
From: Rui Prior [mailto:rpr...@dcc.fc.up.pt]
IMO, exposing such degree of (low level) control should be avoided.
I disagree on principle :). If we want true webapps we need to not be afraid to
give them capabilities (like POSTing data to S3) that native apps have.
In cases where the size of
From: Rui Prior [mailto:rpr...@dcc.fc.up.pt]
If you absolutely need to stream content whose length is unknown beforehand
to a server not supporting ckunked encoding, construct your web service so
that it supports multiple POSTs (or whatever), one per piece of data to
upload.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Domenic Denicola d...@domenic.me wrote:
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Takeshi Yoshino tyosh...@google.com
wrote:
How about padding the remaining bytes