Re: Components F2F

2015-07-02 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@apple.com wrote: Is Google hosting this meeting as well? Alternatively, would other browser vendors (e.g. Mozilla) willing to host it this time? If we decide quickly it seems I can reserve a room at Mozilla for 18 people in SF, maybe 22 in

Re: Components F2F

2015-07-02 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Jun 30, 2015, at 2:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote: Can someone update https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebComponentsJuly2015Meeting with a bit more information? I hear it might be in Mountain View? Is Google hosting this meeting as well? Alternatively, would other

Re: Custom Elements: is=

2015-07-02 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Jun 13, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Léonie Watson lwat...@paciellogroup.com wrote: From: Bruce Lawson [mailto:bru...@opera.com] Sent: 13 June 2015 16:34 On 13 June 2015 at 15:30, Léonie Watson lwat...@paciellogroup.com wrote: why not use the extends= syntax you mentioned? my-button

Custom Elements: createdCallback cloning

2015-07-02 Thread Anne van Kesteren
In the interest of moving forward I tried to more seriously consider Dmitry's approach. Based on es-discussion discussion https://esdiscuss.org/topic/will-any-new-features-be-tied-to-constructors it seems likely new JavaScript features (such as private state) will be tied to object creation. This

Re: Better focus support for Shadow DOM

2015-07-02 Thread 河内 隆仁
Hi, Changes for Blink have landed and now you can play this by enabling experimental web platform features in chrome://flags. Now I am proposing this as a patch to shadow DOM, at https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/ShadowRoot-delegatesFocus-Proposal.md Feel free to

Re: Components F2F

2015-07-02 Thread chaals
Google had offered to host the meeting, and I believe they are on it. Obviously, offers to share the hosting effort are welcome in general. I haven't checked but agree that based on last time 22 might be squeezing it. cheers 02.07.2015, 09:11, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl: On Thu, Jul

RE: [ime-api] [blink-dev] Removing IME API code from Blink

2015-07-02 Thread Travis Leithead
Arrg. It's far-less used than I thought. It turns out that it _was_ used in production last year, but then it was removed from production when a UI change interfered and the bug to fix it is still open :( So, my guess is that as of today, we have infinitesimal-small usage of this API in IE.

Re: Async Image - ImageData conversion

2015-07-02 Thread Jeff Muizelaar
I'm not sure having a hub is worth the implementation pain. It looks like there are three pretty different things here: ImageBitmap - Immutable images for drawing on canvas. Typically premultiplied data located on the GPU ImageData - Mutable script accessible array of data. Unpremultiplied data

Re: [shadow-dom] ::before/after on shadow hosts

2015-07-02 Thread 河内 隆仁
Sorry for coming late, but - crbug.com/393490 Before and After pseudo elements don't work in ShadowRoots (with :host styles) - crbug.com/393509 :host()::before or :host()::after should work have the relevant discussion about the current implementation in Blink (#2). On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:16

Re: CR: Web Storage (Second Edition)

2015-07-02 Thread timeless
http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-webstorage-20150609/ Particpate: [sic] the event must have its key attribute initialised to the name of the key in question, `initialized` [About 11,800,000 results] should be spelled as such for w3c specs (w3c is en-us) instead of `initialised` [About 553,000

Re: Async Image - ImageData conversion

2015-07-02 Thread Justin Novosad
Making ImageData the hub would imply more copies in memory in many cases. Because ImageData is mutable (not to mention the alpha multiplication issues which are also a factor), it cannot share its image buffer with the source it was created from, unlike ImageBitmap. Immutability is a significant