On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> I have a related question: what happens if the constructor throws?
Right, this is the kind of thing we need to figure out.
>
>
> "use strict";
>
> window.throwingMode = true;
>
> class XFoo extends HTMLElement {
> constructor() {
Thanks everyone! Started a draft agenda page here; please pile in!
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/wiki/july_20_2015_meeting_agenda
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Benjamin Kelly wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Alex Russell
> wrote:
>
>> As many SW participants are goin
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Anne changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28614
Anne changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@annevk.nl]
>> // What about
>> document.body.innerHTML = "[512 KiB of normal HTML] ";
>> // ? does the HTML make it in, or does the operation fail atomically, or
>> something else?
>
> It fails atomically, based on the definition of innerHTML.
What if tha
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
> From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@annevk.nl]
>> It fails atomically, based on the definition of innerHTML.
>
> What if that 512 KiB of HTML contains ? Following
> definitions, I assume we fire off the network request?
If I look at "
On 7/17/15 10:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
If I look at "update the image data" step 6 it seems it might be
fetched at a later point?
Yes, but in practice the fetch will go ahead, no? There's nothing to
prevent it from happening, so it's going to happen once you reach a
stable state...
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 7/17/15 10:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>> If I look at "update the image data" step 6 it seems it might be
>> fetched at a later point?
>
> Yes, but in practice the fetch will go ahead, no? There's nothing to
> prevent it from happeni
On 7/17/15 12:05 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
True, but either way this doesn't seem like a problem. You can create
a DocumentFragment, insert a new , and then let it be GC'd,
today.
Sure. In practice it won't get GC'd until the load completes, which is
sucky, but that's life.
-Boris
OK, after reading Dominic's proposal [1], I'm a little confused. I thought that
I understood how constructors should work, but there's some magic going on that
I can't follow... I'm sure you folks can help.
```
class CustomElement extends HTMLElement {
constructor() {
super();
}
}
S
From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com]
> Something magical happens here. The use of super() is supposed to call the
> constructor of the HTMLElement class—but that’s not a normal JS class. It
> doesn’t have a defined constructor() method [yet?].
Yep. We'd need to define o
Hi all,
Over the last few days I’ve worked on two new potential ideas for custom
elements, hoping to shake things up with new possibilities. These are both
largely geared around how we react to the key custom elements question [1].
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Op
On 7/17/15 2:03 PM, Travis Leithead wrote:
Something magical happens here. The use of super() is supposed to call
the constructor of the HTMLElement class—but that’s not a normal JS
class. It doesn’t have a defined constructor() method
Sure, but neither does Array. What super() actually does i
From: Domenic Denicola [mailto:d...@domenic.me]
>
>From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com]
>
>> Something magical happens here. The use of super() is supposed to call the
>> constructor of the HTMLElement class—but that’s not a normal JS class. It
>> doesn’t have a defined
From: Travis Leithead [mailto:travis.leith...@microsoft.com]
> if super() is absolutely required for a constructor in a class
> that extends something, is there a requirement about when in the
> constructor method it be invoked? Must it always be the first call? Can it be
> later on, say at the en
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Travis Leithead
> wrote:
>
> From: Domenic Denicola [mailto:d...@domenic.me]
>
>>> window.XFoo = document.registerElement(‘x-foo’, XFooStartup);
>>
>> Why is XFoo different from XFooStartup? If I define a method in XFooStartup,
>> does it exist in XFoo?
>
> T
16 matches
Mail list logo
