RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Léonie Watson
Important: This CFC is extended for 48 hours. Please provide comments by end of day on Thursday 23rd June 2016. From: Vincent Scheib [mailto:sch...@google.com] Sent: 21 June 2016 05:09 “I've discussed more with Xiaoqian and Léonie and support a CR now with this proposal: Move to a CR

RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Léonie Watson
From: Takayoshi Kochi [mailto:ko...@google.com] “I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the intended change to the spec yet, and so it could be immature to include in a "CR". (Does CR require at least 2 implementors exist?)” Yes, CR requires at least

RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Léonie Watson
From: Léonie Watson [mailto:t...@tink.uk] Sent: 21 June 2016 11:18 Yes, CR requires at least two implementations in shipping browsers. Once Pointer Lock is at Recc, hopefully the Shadow DOM content will be stable enough to include in Pointer Lock next. Correction: A CR doesn’t require 2+

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Takayoshi Kochi
I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the intended change to the spec yet, and so it could be immature to include in a "CR". (Does CR require at least 2 implementors exist?) On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Vincent Scheib wrote: > I've