Re: [fileapi] Pull Request on GitHub

2016-08-17 Thread Marijn Kruisselbrink
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Arun Ranganathan wrote: > I won't be editing it either. > > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Marcos Caceres > wrote: > >> On August 16, 2016 at 6:31:31 PM, Zhen Zhang (izgz...@gmail.com) wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I have a

WG Decision on referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension

2016-08-17 Thread Adrian Bateman
The chairs have published details of the Working Group decision on referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension in HTML. In short, most of the CfC carried without objection but there were some objections related to the longdesc examples. For convenience, the decision text is pasted

RE: [fileapi] Pull Request on GitHub

2016-08-17 Thread Adrian Bateman
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:38:59, Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote: > Sorry about that. Somehow that PR slipped through the cracks. I've commented > on the PR. > > Anybody knows what the deal is with the ipr check? What makes it fail, and if > it fails who is supposed to do what to not make it fail?

Re: CfC: Pointer Lock to Proposed Recommendation; deadline August 20

2016-08-17 Thread Léonie Watson
+1 Great for this to be progressing. Léonie. -- @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem On 14/08/2016 00:01, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: Hello, Web Platform WG, This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed Recommendation of Pointer Lock using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement with this CfC means you