On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Arun Ranganathan
> I won't be editing it either.
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Marcos Caceres
>> On August 16, 2016 at 6:31:31 PM, Zhen Zhang (izgz...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I have a
The chairs have published details of the Working Group decision
on referencing the Image Description (longdesc) extension in HTML.
In short, most of the CfC carried without objection but there were
some objections related to the longdesc examples.
For convenience, the decision text is pasted
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:38:59, Marijn Kruisselbrink wrote:
> Sorry about that. Somehow that PR slipped through the cracks. I've commented
> on the PR.
> Anybody knows what the deal is with the ipr check? What makes it fail, and if
> it fails who is supposed to do what to not make it fail?
Great for this to be progressing.
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
On 14/08/2016 00:01, Xiaoqian Wu wrote:
Hello, Web Platform WG,
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed Recommendation of
Pointer Lock using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement with this CfC means