Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-02 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Steve Faulkner > wrote: > > In this radio and checkbox example (view in chrome) > > https://rawgit.com/alice/web-components-demos/master/index.html > > (which has been referenced several times in this t

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-02 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Steve Faulkner > wrote: > > In this radio and checkbox example (view in chrome) > > https://rawgit.com/alice/web-components-demos/master/index.html > > (which has been referenced several times in this t

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-04 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Chris Bateman > wrote: > >> Yeah, I had noted in that post that wrapping a native element with a >> custom element was an option - only drawback is tha

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-04 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Alice Boxhall wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 4, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: >>>

Re: Minimum viable custom elements

2015-02-04 Thread Alice Boxhall
n the , right? So you'd have to keep them in sync regardless. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2015, at 11:05 AM, Alice Boxhall wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Brian Kardell wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Feb 4, 201

Re: Custom Elements: is=""

2015-05-06 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:46 PM, LĂ©onie Watson > wrote: > > My understanding is that sub-classing would give us the accessibility > inheritance we were hoping is= would provide. Apologies if I've missed it > somewhere obvious, but is ther

Re: Making ARIA and native HTML play better together

2015-05-09 Thread Alice Boxhall
I agree we badly need the primitives, but it seems to me like there is potentially an easier and maybe even bigger win in making it more straightforward for developers to reuse existing patterns (like the one you described for "button" earlier) than in explaining the existing patterns and allowing

Re: Custom Elements: is=""

2015-05-09 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Alice Boxhall wrote: > > I definitely acknowledge is= may not be the ideal solution to the latter > > problem - it definitely has some holes in it, especially when you start > > addin

Re: Custom Elements: is=""

2015-06-08 Thread Alice Boxhall
Did anyone have any further thoughts on this? My concerns haven't changed. On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Alice Boxhall wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Anne van Kesteren > wrote: > >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Alice Boxhall >> wrote: >> > I

Re: Custom Elements: is=""

2015-06-08 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > > On Jun 8, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Alice Boxhall wrote: > > > > Did anyone have any further thoughts on this? My concerns haven't > changed. > > Nothing new. > > > On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Alic

Re: Custom Elements: is=""

2015-06-08 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > On Jun 8, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Alice Boxhall wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > >> >> > On Jun 8, 2015, at 2:16 PM, Alice Boxhall wrote: >> Web developers are already writ

Re: Custom Elements: is=""

2015-06-09 Thread Alice Boxhall
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Alice Boxhall > wrote: > > - In the time between v1 and v2 (however long that ends up being) we are > > left without any way to solve this problem, assuming we don't come up &g

Re: Custom Elements: is=""

2015-06-13 Thread Alice Boxhall
Doc in progress at https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/Type-Extensions.md On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > Folks, > > I agree with Anne that we've been having a somewhat circular re-discovery > of the pros/cons here. I believe that the best way t