Re: ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products]

2008-06-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
All, On Jun 17, 2008, at 7:10 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:45:04 +0900, Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ISSUE-7 (Transfer Old Issues): Transferring old WebAPI and WAF [All Products]

[widgets] Minutes of 26 June 2008 Voice Conference

2008-06-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
be Public and give the WG two weeks to discuss/object [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-07-03]. Comments on the Requirements LC doc AB: thanks Marcos for getting this out! JS: I sent Marcos comments already ... I sent him some additional comments ... I still have some more comments to submit

Re: Proposal for an extension XMLHttpRequest to allow sending files

2008-07-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Sam, This seems like a reasonable extension to me. A colleague asks Are there any new security concerns by putting this inside XHR, or is the assumption that we are not exposing anything new? What are your thoughts on that question? I presume not exposing anything new given this type

Re: Accessibility requirement

2008-07-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, Cynthia, Perhaps requirement #37 as currently written [1] is overly prescriptive. For example, rather than trying to enumerate the sub-requirements for the other language (i.e. the non-HTML language), there could just be a reference to a spec/doc that defines the requirements for a

[widgets] Minutes from 31 July 2008 Voice Conference

2008-07-31 Thread Arthur Barstow
asked to do a review [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-08-07]. Benoit: we want to use the f2f to finalize the PC spec, right? MC: yes, that's the plan Bryan: what level of comments are you expecting? ... thoughts and questions or detailed requiements? MC: comments at all levels

Proposal to advance Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation

2008-08-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Web Apps WG Members, This e-mail serves as a formal proposal to advance the Element Traversal spec to Candidate Recommendation. The disposition of comments for this spec's Last Call WD is [LC-comments]. Doug's latest Editor's Draft is the basis for the CR version [ET] and it includes the

Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-08-04 Thread Arthur Barstow
Of Steven Faulkner Sent: 31 July 2008 14:21 To: Arthur Barstow Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ext Marcos Caceres Subject: Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD The current spec states: R37. Language Accessibility A conforming specification must specify that the language used

[widgets] Agenda for 21 August 2008 Voice Conference

2008-08-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the agenda for the August 21 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Logistics: Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane Duration = 60 minutes Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231 (WAF1) IRC channel = #wam; irc.w3.org:6665 Confidentiality of minutes =

[widgets] Minutes of 26 August 2008 Widgets f2f meeting

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
with resolution above [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-09-02]. Issue #46 - Need to define a span for i18n purposes in configuration document AB: issue is [40]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/46 [40] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/46 MC: the issue is that part

[widgets] Minutes of 27 August 2008 Widgets f2f meeting

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
] trackbot Created ACTION-227 - Close Issue #15 with the resolution above [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-09-03]. Issue #19 - Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required use cases and requirements AB: the issue is: [31]http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/19 [31] http://www.w3

[widgets] Minutes of 28 August 2008 Widgets f2f meeting

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
and rationale in the 28 Aug 2008 minutes [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-09-04]. Benoit big table and a router's fan near the phone area... sorry scribe ACTION: David work with OMTP members to provide input on the enabling access to proprietary APIs model [recorded in [27]http

Re: ISSUE-17: Widgets (not just widget engines) should be able to specify which proxies they communicate through

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26. Please see the following for details: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item03 -Regards, Art Barstow On Jun 26, 2008, at 4:18 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: ISSUE-17:

Re: ISSUE-18 (api-availability): Need to efine a mechanism to check for the availability of an API [Widgets]

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 28. Please see the following for details: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/28-wam-minutes.html#item02 -Regards, Art Barstow On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:13 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: ISSUE-18

Re: ISSUE-20 (Content multi-view): Current content model does not allow multiple views [Widgets]

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26. Please see the following for details: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item13 -Regards, Art Barstow On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:07 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: ISSUE-20

Re: ISSUE-21: should Widgets 1.0 allow fallback for content element? [Widgets]

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26. Please see the following for details: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item14 -Regards, Art Barstow On Jun 27, 2008, at 12:30 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: ISSUE-21:

Re: ISSUE-34: What happens when one runs out of storage space when decompressing a widget? [Widgets]

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 26. Please see the following for details: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/26-wam-minutes.html#item11 -Regards, Art Barstow On Jul 4, 2008, at 3:46 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote: My reaction is that this is local error

Re: ISSUE-35: SVG as an icon format. [Widgets]

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 28. Please see the following for details: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/28-wam-minutes.html#item03 -Regards, Art Barstow On Jul 3, 2008, at 11:41 PM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: ISSUE-35: SVG

Re: ISSUE-36: Is the file API going to be part of Widgets 1.0? [Widgets]

2008-08-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
This issue has been closed, based on the WG's agreement on August 28. Please see the following for details: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/28-wam-minutes.html#item04 -Regards, Art Barstow On Jul 4, 2008, at 12:26 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: ISSUE-36: Is

Re: FileUpload Editor | Re: File Upload Status ?

2008-09-07 Thread Arthur Barstow
Thanks for taking the lead on this Arun! Since we eventually need to show we've satisfied its [=the spec's] relevant technical requirements [1], did the Web API WG do some related requirements work? If yes, where can we find that work? -Regards, Art Barstow [1]

[widgets] Agenda for 11 September 2008 Voice Conference

2008-09-10 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the agenda for the September 11 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Logistics: Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane Duration = 60 minutes Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231 (WAF1) IRC channel = #wam; irc.w3.org:6665 Confidentiality of minutes =

[widgets] Agenda for 18 September 2008 Voice Conference

2008-09-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the proposed agenda for the September 18 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane Duration = 60 minutes Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200,

[widgets] Last Call WD #2 of Widgets 1.0 Requirements published; Comments Due 13 October 2008

2008-09-22 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, On September the Web Apps WG published Last Call Working Draft #2 of the Widgets 1.0 Requirements document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-widgets-reqs-20080915/ All comments, feedback, etc. are welcome but please note the deadline is October 13. -Regards, Art Barstow

[widgets] Minutes from 25 September 2008 Voice Conference

2008-09-25 Thread Arthur Barstow
regarding status of core API and events specification [recorded in [15]http://www.w3.org/2008/09/25-wam-minutes.html#action01] trackbot Created ACTION-252 - Ping Arve regarding status of core API and events specification [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-02]. automatic updates scribe

Seeking feedback regarding Widgets Digital Signatures spec

2008-09-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
Frederick, All, As you may know, the Web Applications WG [WebApps] is working on a Digital Signature specification for Widgets (see [Widgets] for a definition of Widget in this context). The FPWD of our Digital Signature spec is at [DigSig-TR] and the latest Editor's Draft is available

[widgets] Agenda for 2 October 2008 Voice Conference

2008-10-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the October 2 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane Duration = 60 minutes Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200,

[widgets] Minutes from 2 October 2008 Voice Conference

2008-10-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
Sig WG re the questions we sent to them last week [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-09]. MC: David, are you going to send us some info OMTP re the DigSig spec? DR: I'll follow-up with Nick AB: Meeting Closed Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Barstow ping the XML Sig WG re

[widgets] Agenda for 9 October 2008 Voice Conference

2008-10-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the October 9 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane Duration = 60 minutes Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200,

[widgets] Minutes from 9 October 2008 Voice Conference

2008-10-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
and Events spec pub ready [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/09-wam-minutes.html#action01] trackbot Created ACTION-254 - Talk to Mike about helping Arve getting the API and Events spec \pub ready\ [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-16]. MikeSmith hai MikeSmith I can deal

[widgets] Agenda for 16 October 2008 Voice Conference

2008-10-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the October 16 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 20:00 Tokyo; 21:00 Brisbane Duration = 60 minutes Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200,

OpenAjax Seeks feedback on their Mobile Device APIs Style Guide

2008-10-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
. -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: ext Jon Ferraiolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: October 17, 2008 11:18:15 AM EDT To: Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Charles McCathieNevile [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Schepers [EMAIL PROTECTED], Pollington, David, VF

[widgets] Minutes from 20 October 2008 f2f meeting

2008-10-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
[on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-27]. AB: I would imagine that type of service could be included in a Widget repository service MC: something like this could be added to validator.nu AB: this is Henri's service? MC: yes, but just giving a schema isn't that helpful ... need

[widgets] Minutes from 21 October f2f meeting

2008-10-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
Carmelo for the URI of his testing paper [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-10-28]. Dom: once you have the testable assertions you still have to create the content corresponding to the test case ... I expect this needs to be done by hand MC: Yes Dom: one way to proceed would be to automate

Follow-up on widgets scheme discussion with TAG members [Was: Re: [Widgets] URI Scheme revisited.... again]

2008-10-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, All, I agree the main follow-up is that we need to do some additional work, particularly regarding fleshing out related requirements. The minutes indicate there are some requirements that aren't explicitly captured in the October 20 version of R6:

Fwd: Position paper deadline extended to 5 Nov. 08 ( Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web - W3C Workshop)

2008-10-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
The deadline for position papers for the workshop on Security Device API Access has been extended to November 5. However, note there are some important details in the e-mail below that you must follow ... -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: ext Marie-Claire Forgue

Re: ISSUE-22 (Is SHA1 good enough?): Is sha1 as a DigestMethod strong enough for Widgets digital signatures?

2008-11-03 Thread Arthur Barstow
Based on the October 21 discussion with the XML Security WG: http://www.w3.org/2008/10/21-wam-minutes.html#item07 The the group decided SHA-256 is required thus this issue is closed. -Regards, Art Barstow On Jun 27, 2008, at 2:02 AM, ext Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker

Fwd: WebApps WG status - 5 November 2008

2008-11-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: ext Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: November 5, 2008 2:17:12 PM EST Subject: WebApps WG status for 7 November 2008 HCG call WebApps' latest publication status is available at: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus There have been no new

Re: [widgets] Agenda for 13 November 2008 Voice Conference

2008-11-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Below is the draft agenda for the October 30 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Correction - the agenda is for the November 13 VC. -Regards, AB

[widgets] Minutes from 13 November 2008 Voice Conference

2008-11-13 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the November 13 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2008/11/13-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before November 20 (the next

[widgets] Agenda for 20 November 2008 Voice Conference

2008-11-18 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the November 20 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 07:00 Boston; 13:00 Paris; 21:00 Tokyo Duration = 60 minutes Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 9231

[widgets] Minutes from 20 November 2008 Voice Conference

2008-11-20 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the November 20 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2008/11/20-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before December 4 (the next

Re: Sketch of an idea to address widget/package addressing with fragID syntax and media-type defn.

2008-12-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, Stuart, On Dec 1, 2008, at 5:29 AM, ext Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) wrote: From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unfortunately, widgets/zip do not maintain media-type information. That information is derived from content-type sniffing heuristics as defined in HTML5

[widgets] Agenda for 4 December 2009 Voice Conference - NOTE NEW TIME!

2008-12-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the November 20 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Two notes on this agenda: 1. NOTE the TIME CHANGE! 2. It is highly unlikely we will cover the Widgets DigSig spec or the API and Events spec. Please review the related ACTIONs and respond accordingly. Inputs

Re: [widgets] Content-type sniffing and file extension to MIME mapping

2008-12-04 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, On Dec 3, 2008, at 5:03 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: A widget user agent would be expected to support the above types. All other types are optional. All proprietary types, apart from ico, are optional. What - if anything - will be prescribed (normative) here for the various

Re: Next steps on Widgets testing?

2008-12-04 Thread Arthur Barstow
Dom, Today, during the Widgets voice conf, we briefly discussed the location you proposed and we agreed with your proposal. Regarding looking at the detailed test cases, Marcos reported he's done a first pass and didn't see any issues. Realistically, I don't believe we will do an

[widgets] Discussion about widget: scheme by TAG

2008-12-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
An FYI for Widget People (that are not subscribed to www-tag) ... The TAG discussed the widget: scheme mechanism during their December 04 meeting. The minutes from that discussion are: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/12/04-minutes.html#item04 -Regards, Art Barstow

[widgets] CfC to publish Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0 Packing and Config spec; Deadline for comments Dec 18

2008-12-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
WebApps WG members, This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a Last Call WD of the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration spec. The latest Editor's Draft is available at the following and Marcos expect to make some minor changes in Section 8 during this 1-week review period:

[widgets] Agenda for 18 December 2008 voice conference

2008-12-16 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the December 18 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London; 10:00 Boston; 07:00 Seattle Duration = 60 minutes

[widgets] Minutes from 18 December 2008 Voice Conference

2008-12-18 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the December 18 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2008/12/18-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 8 January 2009 (the

[widgets] Agenda for 8 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the January 8 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London; 10:00 Boston; 07:00 Seattle Duration = 60 minutes Zakim

[widgets] Minutes from 8 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the January 8 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/01/08-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 15 January 2009 (the

Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009

2009-01-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Bcc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org, public-b...@w3.org, wai-xt...@w3.org, public-m...@w3.org Reply-to: public-webapps@w3.org (archived at [1]) The Web Applications WG [2] explicitly seeks comments from the I18N, Mobile Web BP, Mobile Web Test Suites and WAI PF Working Groups regarding the 22

Re: [access-control] Rename spec?

2009-01-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi, On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:50 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote: I know some people (e.g. Ian) don't like the idea, but it seems the name Access Control for Cross-Site Requests confuses people, especially the Access Control part: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/12/10-minutes#item03

[widgets] Agenda for 15 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-14 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the January 15 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London; 10:00 Boston; 07:00 Seattle Duration = 60 minutes Zakim

[widgets] Agenda for 22 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-21 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the January 22 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion on the agenda topics before the meeting is encouraged. Logistics: Time: 24:00 Tokyo; 17:00 Helsinki; 16:00 Paris; 15:00 London; 10:00 Boston; 07:00 Seattle Duration = 60 minutes

[widgets] Minutes from 22 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-22 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the January 22 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/01/22-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 29 January 2009 (the

CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2

2009-01-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
WebApps WG Members - this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the Element Traversal errata as proposed by Cameron: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/ 0168.html As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be

Re: [widgets] Removing plugins attribute

2009-01-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, All, On Jan 22, 2009, at 9:16 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: In the PC spec, I would really like to drop the access element's plugins attribute and just leave it to implementations to cope with proprietary content types. Does anyone have a problem with this? Given we have no related

[widgets] Agenda for 29 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the January 29 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). So that we can focus on comments related to the LCWD of the Widgets Packaging and Configuration spec, the Widgets Digital Signature spec is not included on this week's agenda. Inputs and discussion on all of

Reminder: January 31 comment deadline for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging Configuration spec

2009-01-28 Thread Arthur Barstow
message: Resent-From: public-webapps@w3.org From: ext Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com Date: January 9, 2009 1:38:51 PM EST To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org Subject: Request for Comments: Last Call WD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging Configuration spec; deadline 31 Jan 2009 Archived-At: http

[widgets] Minutes from 29 January 2009 Voice Conference

2009-01-29 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the January 29 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/01/29-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 February 2009

[widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: PC spec

2009-01-31 Thread Arthur Barstow
I propose the following changes to the 22 December 2008 PC LCWD [1]: 1. As currently written, the spec implies a Widget User Agent must support [Widgets-DigSig]. I think that requirement is too strong and must be relaxed. To address this, change the first paragraph in Section 3.0 to: [[

Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: PC spec

2009-01-31 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, On Jan 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: Ok, fair enough. However, I think the words such as does not make the assertion sound particularly definitive. I think it MUST that widget engines support the APIs and a SHOULD that they support updates and sigs. New text: A

Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: PC spec

2009-02-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:43 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Art, On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote: Does the PC spec include any normative assertions that create a dependency on the API Events spec? I just made a quick scan of the PC's

Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: PC spec

2009-02-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, All, On Jan 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: 3. Signature handling should be specified in [Widgets-DigSig], thus, replace all of Step 5 in section 8.2 with the following: [[ The algorithm that describes how to process the list of signatures created in step 4 is

Comment period extended to Feb 11 for LCWD of Widgets 1.0: Packaging Configuration spec

2009-02-03 Thread Arthur Barstow
The comment period for the LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration spec has been extended to Feb 11. -Regards, Art Barstow Begin forwarded message: From: Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com Date: January 28, 2009 3:53:35 PM EST To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org

[widgets] NO voice conference on 5 Feb; next call is 12 Feb

2009-02-03 Thread Arthur Barstow
Widget People - given regrets from some key members of the Widget group for Feb 5, we will not have a call that day. Please submit all comments for the PC LCWD by Feb 11. The latest ED is at: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/ Also, please continue to work on your open Actions:

Fwd: Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web: Workshop Report Published

2009-02-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
Begin forwarded message: From: ext Ian Jacobs i...@w3.org Date: February 5, 2009 3:05:02 PM EST To: public-device-a...@w3.org public-device-a...@w3.org Subject: Security for Access to Device APIs from the Web: Workshop Report Published Archived-At:

Seeking implementation status of XBL2

2009-02-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi All, The W3C's XBL2 Candidate spec [1] was published almost two years ago. Since then, there has been some implementation activity reported (e.g. [2],[3]) but nothing recently. Does anyone have XBL2 implementation status they can share with us? -Regards, Art Barstow [1]

Re: [widgets] Comments on the 22-Dec-2008 LCWD of the Widgets 1.0: PC spec

2009-02-10 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, On Feb 3, 2009, at 9:15 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: The spec now reads: [[ A user agent is a user agent that attempts to implement this specification. Note: The user agent described in this specification does not denote a widget user agent at large: that is, a user agent that

[widgets] Action 293: Add the tag: scheme to the scheme pros and cons document

2009-02-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Marcos, To facilitate addressing Action 293 (Add the tag: scheme to the scheme pros and cons document), and to provide an easy way for other members of the group to contribute to the widget scheme pros and cons discussion, I copied your slide set to our wiki:

[widgets] Minutes from 12-Feb-2009 Voice Conference

2009-02-12 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the February 12 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/12-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 19 February 2009 (the

Fwd: Unicode normalization issue summary

2009-02-15 Thread Arthur Barstow
FYI. A summary of the Unicode Normalization issue by Addison Phillips. Begin forwarded message: From: ext Phillips, Addison addi...@amazon.com Date: February 12, 2009 6:47:14 PM EST Cc: public-i18n-c...@w3.org public-i18n-c...@w3.org Subject: normalization issue summary for HCG Archived-At:

[widgets] Minutes from 19 February 2009 Voice Conference

2009-02-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the February 19 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/19-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next

[widgets] Declarative support for a widget's metadata

2009-02-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, A few weeks ago we talked about how a widget author could add widget- specific metadata (e.g. initial settings) to the config file [1]. I think providing a declarative means to provide this metadata is consistent with existing Req #14 - Widget Metadata [2]. Additionally, at least

WebApps WG the OMTP Turin Rules are now Public

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The so-called OMTP Turin Rules can be downloaded from WebApps' wiki: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/images/8/8b/BONDI-W3C-IPR- Turin-Rules-v04.pdf -Regards, Art Barstow On Feb 23, 2009, at 4:32 AM, ext Engel-Flechsig wrote: Dear Art, Please find below the (revised) version 04 of the

[widgets] Minutes from 26 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
://www.w3.org/2009/02/26-wam-minutes.html#action04] trackbot Created ACTION-316 - Send Josh the relevant pointers to facilitate his creating requirements for URI scheme [on Arthur Barstow - due 2009-03-05]. AB: who from BONDI can help? DR: I'll take this back to OMTP scribe

[widgets] Minutes from 25 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the February 25 Widgets f2f meeting are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next

[widgets] Minutes from 24 February 2009 Widgets F2F Meeting

2009-02-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the February 24 Widgets f2f meeting are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/02/24-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 5 March 2009 (the next

[cors] Call for Consensus to publish new Working Draft; ends March 6

2009-03-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
WebApps WG members, This is Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the CORS spec (with a new cors short-name): http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/ Please respond by March 6 at the latest. As always, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be

Re: BONDI Candidate Release 1.0 - open for public comment until 9th of March 2009

2009-03-02 Thread Arthur Barstow
David, Since many of WebApps' members are not familiar with OMTP and BONDI, I have a some first order process-related questions regarding the proposed Release Candidate (RC). I'll withhold other comments e.g spec forking, fragmentation, etc. for now. * Where can we find the process that

[widgets] Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

2009-03-04 Thread Arthur Barstow
Below is the draft agenda for the March 5 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened meeting). Logistics: Time: 23:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00

[widgets] Minutes from 5 March 2009 Voice Conference

2009-03-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the March 5 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/05-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 12 March 2009 (the next

Re: ISSUE-19: Widgets digital Signatures spec does not meet required use cases and requirements [Widgets]

2009-03-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
During the March 5 widgets voice conference, the group agreed [1] this issue can be closed since the latest version of the Widgets Digital Signature spec [2] address this issues' concerns. -Regards, Art Barstow [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/03/05-wam-minutes.html#item04 [2]

Re: ISSUE-83 (digsig should not be read at runtime): Instantiated widget should not be able to read digital signature [Widgets]

2009-03-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
Mark - during the March 5 widgets voice conference we discussed this issue that you raised [1]. Marcos created this issue from the following e-mail thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/ 0521.html A couple of the people on the call asked for some more

Re: [cors] Call for Consensus to publish new Working Draft; ends March 6

2009-03-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Mar 2, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Barstow Art (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote: WebApps WG members, This is Call for Consensus to publish a new Working Draft of the CORS spec (with a new cors short-name): http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/ Please respond by March 6 at the latest. As always,

Re: [Widgets] APIs and Events preference change

2009-03-09 Thread Arthur Barstow
Arve, On Mar 5, 2009, at 9:14 AM, ext Arve Bersvendsen wrote: After the last F2F in Paris, I spoke to Ian Hickson about the Storage APIs in HTML5, and my understanding is now that his intent is to split this part of the spec into a separate document. This makes it much easier for us to

[widgets] Opportunities and ToDos ... [Was: Agenda for 5 March 2009 Voice Conference]

2009-03-10 Thread Arthur Barstow
Bryan, Marcos, All, Among the areas we need contributions: * The red block issues in the specs as well as inputs to address open actions and Issues: http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/8 * Widgets test suite - does BONDI have something we can use? I don't understand how they

[D3E] Draft minutes from 11 March 2009 telcon

2009-03-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
The Draft minutes from the DOM 3 Events Voice Conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/11-webapps-minutes.html The next D3E voice conference is 18 March. -Regards, Art Barstow [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/

Fwd: Last Call for comments on Selectors (css3-selectors)

2009-03-11 Thread Arthur Barstow
Selectors fans - the CSS WG published a LCWD of the Selectors spec; comments due April 7: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/ Begin forwarded message: From: ext Bert Bos b...@w3.org Date: March 11, 2009 3:05:24 PM EDT Subject: Last Call for comments on Selectors

Re: [widgets] Screenshots and case sensitive file names

2009-03-13 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos - I prefer your 2nd proposal. Unless contrary views are expressed in the next few days, I recommend adding your proposal to the ED. -Regards, Art Barstow On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:53 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi, I've decided that having the screenshots at the root of the widget

Re: Revised Proposal for Widget Signature ABNF

2009-03-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, On Mar 16, 2009, at 10:42 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Frederick Hirsch frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote: Yes, I made this change since we decided this week to have case sensitivity. Too bad we have to use literals in hex for this case ... Hmmm...

Re: [widgets] Comments on Widget Signature update (was RE: Widget Signature update)

2009-03-17 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, Frederick, I should have asked Frederick to make the changes Marcos suggested below. Sorry about that! Anyhow, Frederick agreed to make the changes. -Regards, Art Barstow On Mar 17, 2009, at 8:44 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: On 3/17/09 12:59 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote: I

[widgets] Minutes from 19 March 2009 Voice Conference

2009-03-19 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the March 19 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/19-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 26 March 2009 (the next

Re: [widgets] Further argument for making config.xml mandatory

2009-03-22 Thread Arthur Barstow
On Mar 19, 2009, at 12:06 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Andrew Welch andrew.j.we...@gmail.com wrote: That's exactly what I was talking about when I said even thought the XML i18n guidelines say it's bad practice,'. Ahh very sorry, I just saw the email

[widgets] Comments on the 9-Feb-2009 BONDI v1.0 Release Candidate

2009-03-22 Thread Arthur Barstow
David - I was not able to submit my comments via the link you provided below. Here is what I wanted to submit ... Below are some comments regarding the BONDI 1.0 Release Candidate (RC). These comments are sent as a Chair of the W3C's Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group (WG) and do not

[widgets] Seeking status of the AE spec

2009-03-22 Thread Arthur Barstow
Marcos, Arve - although the status of the AE spec was on the agenda of the March 19 widgets voice conference, we did not have time to get to that item. What is the status of the AE spec and which of the Widgets Open Actions and Issues must be addressed before the AE spec is ready for a

[widgets] Minutes from 26 March 2009 Voice Conference

2009-03-26 Thread Arthur Barstow
The minutes from the March 26 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/26-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before 2 April 2009 (the next

[admin] Seeking clarification of otsi-arch-sec mail list

2009-03-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi, Where can we find: a) a short description of the otsi-arch-sec mail list (e.g. its function); b) who is subscribed to this list and c) its Public archive? Also, is this mail list writable by anyone that has not agreed to the Turin Rules [1]? -Regards, Art Barstow [1]

[admin] Seeking clarification of otsi-arch-sec mail list

2009-03-27 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi, Where can we find: a) a short description of the otsi-arch-sec mail list (e.g. its function); b) who is subscribed to this list and c) its Public archive? Also, is this mail list writable by anyone that has not agreed to the Turin Rules [1]? -Regards, Art Barstow [1]

[widgets] Widget spec plan presented to BONDI Steering Group

2009-04-01 Thread Arthur Barstow
All - on March 30 I attended the BONDI Steering Group's f2f meeting in Cambridge, MA US. In the interest of aligning our Widgets specs with BONDI, I said the following regarding my expectations for Widgets spec publication for the next three months. I made it clear that I spoke solely as a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >