Re: [WebIDL] Assigning to constants

2008-06-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: Yes. The properties set for IDL consts on the interface object, the interface prototype object (or corresponding exception ones) should all be ReadOnly. (And the prototype is where the constant comes from in the document.documentElement.ELEMENT_NODE case.) Magnus

Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]

2008-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
/charCode. Is there some pragmatic reason to force this casting? These strings are meant to represent keys, rather than characters of input. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]

2008-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi Doug. Doug Schepers: Converting to uppercase strikes me as needless legacy from keyCode/charCode. Is there some pragmatic reason to force this casting? Cameron McCormack: These strings are meant to represent keys, rather than characters of input. Doug Schepers: A reasonable argument

[D3E] Multiple keyboard identifiers

2008-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
of the “Unicode character categories” term. ▪ “Asterix” should be “Asterisk” in the key identifiers set section. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]

2008-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
is in use). I believe that is the intention, anyway. Do you mind if I forward this exchange back to public-webapps and public-i18n-core? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: ISSUE-23 (Key Indentifier Case): Should Key Identifiers prioritize uppercase characters [DOM3 Events]

2008-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
. If you could include those two lists in any reply that’d be helpful. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Publishing Web IDL (née Language Bindings for DOM)

2008-07-03 Thread Cameron McCormack
/WebIDL/#changes Charles, barring any objections, could you put that question to the group? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [selectors-api] Selectors API comments: section 2

2008-07-09 Thread Cameron McCormack
for optional arguments): any opinion? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]

2008-07-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
(or a plain Event) should be retargetted or stopped. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: ISSUE-42 (simpler custom events): Should we simplify custom events? [DOM3 Events]

2008-07-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
method of communication other than DOM events (since a custom event that is stopped would by definition be used just for communication within a single shadow scope). So perhaps XBL2 should say that events that inherit from MutationEvent are stopped and all other events are retargetted. -- Cameron

Re: [WebIDL] ES3.1 'flexible' attribute and 'delete' semantics

2008-08-14 Thread Cameron McCormack
this with the blessing of a spec, rather than de factor behaviour. Given MS’s interest in following Web IDL, there’s a chance we could get all four browsers doing the same thing, too. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5

2008-08-27 Thread Cameron McCormack
to that IDL interface. You can think of an interface object with [[Construct]] as being also a factory object for that interface, that happens to allow the use of 'new' in ES to invoke the factory method. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [whatwg] WebIDL and HTML5

2008-08-27 Thread Cameron McCormack
more sense to define the DOM string type as including null than not. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Web IDL? An IDL for the Web?

2008-09-03 Thread Cameron McCormack
idea to explicitly call out in the introduction of Web IDL that it is not related to WIDL apart from the name. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [ProgressEvents]

2008-09-08 Thread Cameron McCormack
. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/SVG/profiles/1.2T/master/udom.idd.diff?r1=1.246r2=1.247 -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

[D3E] Include mouse capture functionality

2008-09-22 Thread Cameron McCormack
in Batik. Thoughts? Thanks, Cameron [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20041027/api.html#GlobalObject -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names

2008-10-05 Thread Cameron McCormack
w, in long x, in long y, in long z); }; I’m on vacation from tomorrow for two weeks, but I’ll carve out some time for working on Web IDL when I return. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-10-31 Thread Cameron McCormack
6.1. Thanks, Cameorn -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-10-31 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: … Thanks, Cameorn Apologies for putting words into Cameorn’s mouth, the mail was obviously from me. :) -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-11-01 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: * In section 6, I don’t think it’s necessary to explicitly mention undefined, since it’s already handled by the annotation in the IDL. If you do want to include this in the prose, I think it needs to be qualified to say that this applies to an ECMAScript language

[WebIDL] Flattening multiple inheritance in prototypes

2008-11-08 Thread Cameron McCormack
interface XY. Cameron McCormack: I didn’t add that one. And now I did, as [ImplementedOn]. Ian Hickson: [re lack of mandated behaviour for prototype chains] I understand what you're saying, but I'd still rather have any black box behaviour be unambiguous. (Non-black-box behaviour

[WebIDL] Value of [[Class]] on host objects

2008-11-11 Thread Cameron McCormack
objects, it’s the identifier of the exception. I’ve left [[Class]] on interface objects and interface prototype objects undefined (which was discussed later on in the thread that starts with Anne’s mail above). -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters

2008-11-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
a node. Then the operations could still handle that common case of being the setter/getter methods. How does that sound? -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] Treatment of getters and setters

2008-11-18 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: So, we probably need to keep requiring the spec using [NamedIndex] to specify in prose what the keys are. That should be sufficient to nominate operations to be the property creator/modifier/deleter handlers. … Then the operations could still handle that common case

Re: [Selectors-API] IDL namespace

2008-11-19 Thread Cameron McCormack
NodeSelector { // … }; }; -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Comments on some Web IDL extended attribute names

2008-11-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
Maciej Stachowiak: I think [NativeObject] should be renamed to [Callback]. It is meant to be used for callback objects that have a single designated callback method, right? Cameron McCormack: Not only a single callback method, perhaps multiple. But yes, it’s pretty much for callbacks

Re: [selectors-api] Investigating NSResolver Alternatives

2008-11-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
) but expects it to move into Web IDL.) The rewritten Operations section of the ECMAScript binding now ignores additional arguments: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#es-operations Passing fewer arguments than required results in a TypeError. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [Bindings] extended attribute for callback function interfaces?

2008-11-23 Thread Cameron McCormack
the arguments out. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] questions

2008-11-26 Thread Cameron McCormack
with the PutForwards extended attribute, but the example below doesn't do that. The example should be valid, so the confusing sentence is wrong. I’ve reworded it now: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#PutForwards Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] questions

2008-11-27 Thread Cameron McCormack
(though nothing need be done with the constants): http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#native-objects Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping

2008-11-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
“::”). I haven’t made the grammar changes yet. I’ll leave that until I get to reworking it to have more robust parsing of extended attributes. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-11-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: * In section 6, I don’t think it’s necessary to explicitly mention undefined, since it’s already handled by the annotation in the IDL. If you do want to include this in the prose, I think it needs to be qualified to say that this applies to an ECMAScript

Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping

2008-11-30 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: OK. The hard coded prefix approach I suggested above would still have a mechanism for overriding that. For example: module dom { interface Node { … }; }; module svg { interface SVGElement : Element { … }; }; [Prefix=org] module acme { interace

Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping

2008-12-01 Thread Cameron McCormack
., which should cover most cases that people would want to do in their own extended attributes.) -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors Last Call

2008-12-02 Thread Cameron McCormack
. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface

2009-01-13 Thread Cameron McCormack
incompatibly, so I guess I don’t see the need for it. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface

2009-01-14 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: The question then is whether we want to include it. I don’t see how it would be beneficial for anyone to redistribute one of the interface files if it has been changed incompatibly, so I guess I don’t see the need for it. Some further off-list discussion regarding general

Re: Fwd: SVG 1.1 Java interface license

2009-01-15 Thread Cameron McCormack
/copyright-software to include the clause?) Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2

2009-01-26 Thread Cameron McCormack
Arthur Barstow: WebApps WG Members - this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the Element Traversal errata as proposed by Cameron: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JanMar/0168.html +1 from me. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

[WebIDL] Including other IDL fragments

2009-01-27 Thread Cameron McCormack
declare the Document type that it uses: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/#xmlhttprequest (Plus the interface is not explicitly in the dom module.) Any thoughts about how to deal with this? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: CfC to publish Errata for Element Traversal Recommendation; deadline February 2

2009-02-05 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi Kartikaya. Kartikaya Gupta: I just noticed that the java binding file has a link to ww.w3.org instead of www.w3.org. Well spotted! I committed an updated ElementTraversal-java-binding.zip file. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-05 Thread Cameron McCormack
Charles McCathieNevile: this is a call for consensus to move the Selectors API [1] to Candidate Recommendation, following the end of the last call. +1 -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-12 Thread Cameron McCormack
in Web IDL to be to stringify to undefined unless overridden, and I would suggest Selectors API to use that behaviour, too. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-12 Thread Cameron McCormack
. That sounds like the better solution to me. Of course, that then makes it incumbent on me to finish those tests reasonably soon to determine what that default behaviour should be… -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-12 Thread Cameron McCormack
. Thanks, Cameron [1] http://mcc.id.au/2009/01/string-handling/tests/006-DOMImplementation-createDocument-1.html -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Copyright license for ElementTraversal Java interface

2009-02-15 Thread Cameron McCormack
Doug Schepers: I would suggest that a separate file be made with the appropriate Java interface file, with the appropriate license, and that it be linked from an errata (and later a second edition). Would this work for you, and for the rest of the WebApps WG? Cameron McCormack: Sounds

Re: Call for Consensus - Selectors API to Candidate Rec

2009-02-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
Charles McCathieNevile: If anyone objects to this approach (which saves some administrative work and some time), please speak up... Web IDL is still a WD. At some point before Rec, I guess selectors-api would need to block on Web IDL progressing. What point should that be? -- Cameron

Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set

2009-03-01 Thread Cameron McCormack
' is missing after 'unsigned' void increment(); }; Fixed, thanks. Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests

2009-03-06 Thread Cameron McCormack
, and will probably change a bit more.) -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [Selectors API] Call for Consensus - approve John Resig's tests

2009-03-06 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: You can require a certain [[Class]] value at the moment with Web IDL, if you use the [PrototypeRoot] extended attribute. And I forgot to mention that since the Object prototype object is required to be in the prototype chain, that its toString would give the “[class X

Re: [PrototypeRoot]

2009-03-06 Thread Cameron McCormack
to. There’s nothing in selectors-api that says “the object returned from querySelectorAll() must implement the NodeList interface and no others” (and I don’t think it’d be a good idea to require that). -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [webidl] DOMString

2009-04-21 Thread Cameron McCormack
that. I’ve added a note to do that when I get some time to allocate to editing Web IDL again. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [webidl] DOMString

2009-04-22 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi Garrett. Cameron McCormack: We could certainly add similar language for the Java language binding section too, though I think there’s less scope for those conversions to throw exceptions (maybe ones like OutOfMemoryException). Garrett Smith: I'm not sure, but I think you might have

Re: [WebIDL] module in ECMAScript

2009-05-31 Thread Cameron McCormack
. With the above, there’d be no way of “turning off” mapping of a module to a namespace object if an ancestor module had [ESNamespace] on it. I’m not sure about the usefulness of the [Prefix] bit, but I’m just copying the same behaviour that exists in the Java binding. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http

Re: [widgets] PC Last Call comments, versioning

2009-06-01 Thread Cameron McCormack
= and baseProfile= in SVG Tiny 1.2 are used only as a hint from the content author as to what minimum version of the language is required for the content to work properly. No difference in processing is required for differently specified version= and baseProfile= attributes. -- Cameron McCormack

Re: [webidl] definition of const string literal

2009-06-14 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: (Also I see that you’re using the “string” and “wstring”, and Lwide string values. Are you of the opinion that Web IDL should introduce those instead of DOMString?) Shiki Okasaka: In my opinion, it would be nice if we can use the keyword 'string' as the same meaning

Re: [WebIDL] double

2009-06-14 Thread Cameron McCormack
754 double precision floating point, here, which is just what JS Number is (except for the NaNs). -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] double

2009-06-14 Thread Cameron McCormack
. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: send data using the Web Socket and UCS-2

2009-06-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
when bad surrogates are used: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-obtain-unicode Nothing in Web IDL references this algorithm. Other specs can do so if it is useful. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] overloading and fallback

2009-06-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
added [AllowAny] to support this: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#AllowAny -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [webidl] DOMString

2009-06-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
if you think it’s insufficient. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set

2009-06-17 Thread Cameron McCormack
of the triples in the effective overload set, any removals of entries from the set are skipped when looking at that argument position. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] overloading and fallback

2009-06-18 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: I added [AllowAny] to support this: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#AllowAny Anne van Kesteren: So a.f(1.23); throws in the example because the method is overloaded? I.e. it would not throw if the method did not accept an A object as argument? Yes

Re: [WebIDL] On overloaded operations in an effective overload set

2009-06-18 Thread Cameron McCormack
that do ToObject() or ToUint32() or whatever will still be performed as appropriate. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Web IDL syntax

2009-06-18 Thread Cameron McCormack
ripe for change? -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Web IDL syntax

2009-06-18 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: Other possible syntax changes - And another one: get rid of the requirement to use forward declarations if you want mutually referencing interfaces. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [Bindings] [[Delete]], hidden operations, missing arguments

2009-06-19 Thread Cameron McCormack
. :-) That was done a while ago. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [bindings] Regarding the algorithm of 4.2.2. Interface prototype object

2009-06-19 Thread Cameron McCormack
changed the spec to flatten the multple inheritance into a single inheritance prototype chain, so I guess that invalidates your comment. I’d appreciate review of what’s currently specified, though. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [webidl] DOMString

2009-06-19 Thread Cameron McCormack
yet to add a section in the Java binding on how “host objects” should deal with “user implemented objects”. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [PrototypeRoot]

2009-06-19 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: Done: The value of the internal [[Class]] property of a host object is determined as follows: * If the host object implements a single interface, then the value of the internal [[Class]] property MUST be the identifier of that interface. Ian

Re: [PrototypeRoot]

2009-06-20 Thread Cameron McCormack
that the most-derived interface that inherits from such an interface is automatically promoted to being the [[Class]]?) That’s right. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [NameCreator] definition buggy

2009-06-20 Thread Cameron McCormack
/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-determine-the-value-of-a-named-property and others, in http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#indexed-property-xattrs and http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#named-property-xattrs Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [selectors-api] Return value of lookupNamespaceURI

2009-06-20 Thread Cameron McCormack
Boris Zbarsky: If the return value of lookupNamespaceURI is |undefined|, should that stringify to or undefined? Same question for |null|. Note that I'm not sure there's an obvious way to annotate this in web idl yet. Cameron McCormack: Yeah, there’s no way to specify

Handling too few arguments in method calls

2009-06-21 Thread Cameron McCormack
to be one of the above two options. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls

2009-06-25 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: From some very brief testing, it seems that Firefox and Opera tend to throw an exception when calling a method with too few arguments, while IE, Safari and Chrome will assume that the missing arguments were the undefined value. Simon Pieters: Hmm. What did you use

Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls

2009-06-25 Thread Cameron McCormack
an undefined value, then we can introduce an ECMAScript-specific extended attribute that permits this. But in general I agree that it would be better if we could remain strict. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls

2009-06-25 Thread Cameron McCormack
to pass too many arguments to web APIs. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls

2009-06-25 Thread Cameron McCormack
(in HTMLImageElement image, in float dx, in float dy); void drawImage(in HTMLImageElement image, in float dx, in float dy, in float dw, in float dh); -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Handling too few arguments in method calls

2009-06-26 Thread Cameron McCormack
with the appropriate people that that is easily testable in gecko. That’d be great. I’d much rather make an informed decision here than just guess. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] module in ECMAScript

2009-06-26 Thread Cameron McCormack
/#es-modules I haven’t done anything with [Prefix] for the moment. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-27 Thread Cameron McCormack
-operating-system/ Are there any others people are aware of? Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
Robin Berjon: I wonder what the value is of having it on Rec track in the first place? Could it simply be a Note? I’d be reluctant to make it a note, given the normative requirements it makes of implementations of a given IDL fragment. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
. It’s these details that I think are in most need of verification somehow. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Specs using Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
...@hixie.dreamhostps.com * Deal with use of [Supplemental] in HTML 5 http://www.w3.org/mid/pine.lnx.4.62.0906190537200.16...@hixie.dreamhostps.com * Define Date (or make it possible to be defined) * Define sequences/ByteArray -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

An import statement for Web IDL

2009-06-28 Thread Cameron McCormack
{ … }; That way the IDL processor knows exactly what dependent IDL files it needs to process, and there’s no need to assume that the user of the IDL files has to place the DOM Core and Views IDL files with specific names in the same directory as the events.idl file. Thoughts? -- Cameron

Fw: An import statement for Web IDL

2009-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
[Forwarded with permission.] - Forwarded message from Dimitry Golubovsky golubov...@gmail.com - From: Dimitry Golubovsky golubov...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:27:28 -0400 To: Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au Subject: An import statement for Web IDL Cameron, On Mon, Jun 29

Re: An import statement for Web IDL

2009-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: I propose that we have an import statement that takes a (possibly relative) URL. … Ian Hickson: I'd rather we just implicitly said that all IDL files were imported. What exactly would “all IDL files” include? The problem with import statements is that (a) they require

Re: Fw: An import statement for Web IDL

2009-06-29 Thread Cameron McCormack
are. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: Web IDL syntax

2009-06-30 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: Following are my half baked proposals. I’ve now baked all of these proposals into the spec, except for the one about allowing multiple module levels with a module declaration (i.e., ‘module a::b::c’). * Made ‘in’ optional http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl

Re: Web IDL syntax

2009-06-30 Thread Cameron McCormack
that will be done. It also won’t include everything from DOM 3 Core. I think it might be useful for someone to just publish versions of existing DOM specs’ IDL as Web IDL. I’m willing to help with that. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] Bugs in DOMString conversion to Unichode characters (was Re: send data using the Web Socket and UCS-2)

2009-06-30 Thread Cameron McCormack
. Should be fixed now. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#dfn-obtain-unicode Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject

2009-06-30 Thread Cameron McCormack
, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF

2009-06-30 Thread Cameron McCormack
. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: [WebIDL] grammar in ABNF

2009-06-30 Thread Cameron McCormack
= (:: ScopedNameAfterColon) | (identifier ScopedNameParts) Cameron McCormack: Was the confusion because the ‘:: ScopedNameAfterColon’ and ‘identifier ScopedNameParts’ weren’t written on the same line? Ah I see the confusion is more about how strongly the ‘|’ operator binds compared to adjacent

Re: Web IDL syntax

2009-07-02 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: I can easily rename the type back to DOMString . I’d like to know if you all think there is any problem in keeping the name as DOMString but removing the null from its set of values, and requiring the use of the nullable type ‘DOMString?’ to specify a string type that does

Re: Web IDL syntax

2009-07-02 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: I can easily rename the type back to DOMString. I’ve renamed it back, but still left null out of its set of values. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: An import statement for Web IDL

2009-07-02 Thread Cameron McCormack
as to how we’re going to use modules. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Re: WebIDL extension proposal for [Enumerable] interface attribute

2009-07-02 Thread Cameron McCormack
Hi Anselm. Cameron McCormack: I think you should define this instead using named properties. It doesn’t seem to be useful to define an interface that has attributes with particular names and types if they might not exist at all (or might exist but be different types). Anselm R Garbe: I

Modules for IDL fragments in W3C specifications (was: Re: An import statement for Web IDL)

2009-07-03 Thread Cameron McCormack
Cameron McCormack: I don’t know how important it is to keep the HTML interfaces in the org.w3c.dom.html package, but it definitely seems important to keep DOM Core and Events interfaces in org.w3c.dom and org.w3c.dom.events. Ian Hickson: Why? How does it affect black-box compliance of Web

[WebIDL] Sequences and arrays

2009-07-07 Thread Cameron McCormack
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#java-sequence http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#java-array Comments welcome. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

  1   2   3   >