Re: Separating Transclusion Mechanisms for Inheritance and Data Binding

2014-04-30 Thread Jan Miksovsky
I just saw Dimitri's reference to my “Filling slots in shadow” blog posts from a while back, so I thought I’d follow up with the experiences I’ve had I wrote it. First, I remain convinced that it will be very helpful for Shadow DOM to provide a feature like this that allows for parent and

Re: Base Template (Was Re: Minimum viable custom elements)

2015-02-13 Thread Jan Miksovsky
Dimitri: Okay, I can follow up with Ryosuke. I’m happy to share our thoughts and needs for subclassing components. Anne/Steve: I’d originally indicated that this technique couldn't be applied to extending native HTML elements. Since the two of your seemed interested in that, I spent some time

Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution

2015-04-22 Thread Jan Miksovsky
Ugh, hit send too fast. In the university site example below, the instance should have been written: physics-department-page span content-slot=“headerFaculty/span /physics-department-page –Jan On Apr 22, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Jan Miksovsky jan@component.kitchen wrote: Hi Tab, Thanks

Re: Proposal for changes to manage Shadow DOM content distribution

2015-04-22 Thread Jan Miksovsky
Hi Tab, Thanks for your feedback! A primary motivation for proposing names instead of CSS selectors to control distribution is to enable subclassing. We think it’s important for a subclass to be able to override a base class insertion point. That seems easier to achieve with a name. It lets

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

2016-03-30 Thread Jan Miksovsky
It sounds like there’s general interest in making this happen, so I went ahead and set up a Doodle poll for this: http://doodle.com/poll/z7qvrafbxw4zyit9. (Chaals: I just noticed you offered to do that as well, but since I’d already set it up, I thought I’d sent it out. Hope that’s okay.) If

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

2016-04-05 Thread Jan Miksovsky
I’m unfamiliar with WebEx. If Chaals or someone wants to make a strong push to use that, please set up the call and send out instructions for joining. Baring that, I propose the default meeting location is on Google Hangouts: https://hangouts.google.com/call/rwiluf6hlbhkzf4566hq4biedye

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

2016-04-05 Thread Jan Miksovsky
Thanks to everyone who participated in the call. (Special thanks to those calling from Tokyo!) Minutes for the meeting are at https://www.w3.org/2016/04/05-webapps-minutes.html .

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

2016-04-01 Thread Jan Miksovsky
It looks like the best date/time for everyone is this coming Tuesday, April 5, 10:00 am – 12:00 pm PDT. Thanks for everyone who participated in the poll. I was not able to find a time when everyone could join, but it appears that we have representation from Apple, Google, and Mozilla, so I

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

2016-04-04 Thread Jan Miksovsky
I never use WebEx, and had proposed Google Hangouts only because I thought it was ubiquitous (and free). I have no idea how to settle this question. If everyone else is happy using WebEx, and someone else can set up the video call, I certainly don’t have a problem with that. (My only issue