Personally, I had no objection to rel="component". It's similar in usage to
rel="stylesheet" in the fact that it's descriptive of what you're linking
to.
On the other hand, rel="include" is very broad. It could just as easily
apply to a stylesheet as a Web component, and may limit the usefulness o
Pardon my question if this has been discussed elsewhere, but it's not clear
from my reading of the "slots" proposal whether they would be allowed to
target elements that are not direct children of the component.
I believe the with the `select` attribute this was implicitly required
because only co
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Hayato Ito wrote:
>
> The hint we can use is:
>
> - tag name
> - id attribute
> - class attribute
> - any other attributes. (Okay to have a dedicated attribute, such as
> 'content-slot')
> - The position of the node in the list
> - Other status, such as ":focused"
