Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

2013-03-11 Thread Philip Walton
Personally, I had no objection to rel=component. It's similar in usage to rel=stylesheet in the fact that it's descriptive of what you're linking to. On the other hand, rel=include is very broad. It could just as easily apply to a stylesheet as a Web component, and may limit the usefulness of the

Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots?

2015-05-18 Thread Philip Walton
Pardon my question if this has been discussed elsewhere, but it's not clear from my reading of the slots proposal whether they would be allowed to target elements that are not direct children of the component. I believe the with the `select` attribute this was implicitly required because only

Re: [webcomponents] How about let's go with slots?

2015-05-19 Thread Philip Walton
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org wrote: The hint we can use is: - tag name - id attribute - class attribute - any other attributes. (Okay to have a dedicated attribute, such as 'content-slot') - The position of the node in the list - Other status, such as