Title: Questions on AE spec
Here are a couple of potentially easy questions on the Widgets 1.0: APIs and Events spec:
5.15 The openURL() Method
Does the appropriate protocol handler mean an external application (e.g. browser for http://) is invoked, or can the handler be the widget user
Hi Art,
My action http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/actions/357 can be closed. The
table that was requested was provided in Widgets 1.0: Window Modes and Media
Query Extensions http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-wm/Overview.src.html. I
didn't do it, but it does meet the original request
Regrets, I have a conflicting meeting.
Best regards,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
Hi Charles,
I have an agenda item for the AOB section or wherever it can fit. I will be
spending most of the time with DAP and part with Webapps (Widgets), but will
try to balance the agendas to be in the APIs meeting as much as possible.
The basic question I have is what is the relationship of
Here are the comments I had to the WARP spec in the Webapps/DAP joint
meeting:
1) Does * grant/require either HTTP or HTTPS as schemes? It would be
better to allow https://*/; or http://*/; distinctly since some
applications may not be allowed by policy to access specific sources
using non-secure
for the domain
My preference would be (1), but I proposed the use of tag= to illustrate how
(2) might work.
Best regards,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:01 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: WebApps WG
need
to fix the access element definition somehow.
Best regards,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:36 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec
...@opera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 7:30 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
Marcos,
I agree there is an assumption behind the approach I proposed, which I also
believe will be valid for the vast
regards,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original Message-
From: Marcos Caceres [mailto:marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:02 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [WARP] Comments to WARP spec
SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW) wrote:
Placing broad restrictions
Maciej,
Security is important in DAP, and should be considered carefully in the context
of each API and its use cases. There is no one size fits all solution to
security, and that includes approaches based solely upon explicit user action
(including explicitly expressed permission via
distinction between the charters on these points.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original Message-
From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schep...@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 7:08 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Charles Pritchard; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: Event handlers - Pointer
I will not be able to attend today's call.
Bryan | ATT
to the user-centric/control
paradigms of the past.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original Message-
From: Arun Ranganathan [mailto:a...@mozilla.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:48 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian Fette; Web Applications
]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:48 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:24 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3
models for Web application access to device resources
will be defined as APIs.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original Message-
From: Arun Ranganathan [mailto:a...@mozilla.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:53 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3
: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 3:42 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
Hi,
Am I correct in thinking that what you find too restrictive
, and may support the
majority of use cases anyway.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
From: Mike Clement [mailto:mi...@google.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 4:40 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working
: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 4:42 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: a...@mozilla.com; Robin Berjon; public-device-a...@w3.org; Ian
Fette; Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: Transferring File* to WebApps - redux
Sorry about the delay in response; I've been out of the office
Marcos,
That method works for well-know URI schemes except for http:// and https://.
The openURL() method would have launched the browser for those schemes, and we
still need a method to do that.
I was not able to attend the last week's call and was not aware there was a
plan to remove the
Anne,
Are you saying that it should not be possible now (with XHR L1) to
receive HTML files via XHR (Receiving HTML documents would indeed be a
newish feature ) ?
This does actually work for me in XHR L1, so I'm unclear about what you
mean below.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original
...@opera.com [mailto:marc...@opera.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:51 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: RE: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL andsend it
to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
Quoting SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Kesteren [mailto:ann...@opera.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 2:49 PM
To: Jonas Sicking; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [XHR] Status Update
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 23:37:25 +0200, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3...@att.com wrote:
Are you saying that it should
[mailto:jo...@sicking.cc]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 5:23 PM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Anne van Kesteren; WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [XHR] Status Update
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:13 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
bs3...@att.com wrote:
Well at least it works in Firefox, Safari, Opera
it is supported.
Thanks for the clarification.
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | ATT
-Original Message-
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@opera.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 9:51 PM
To: Jonas Sicking; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [XHR] Status Update
On Tue, 10
]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:30 AM
To: gaut...@opera.com; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG
Subject: Re: ACTION-568: Create an alternative mechanism for openURL andsend it
to the mail list (Web Applications Working Group)
On 8/10/10 9:03 AM, gaut...@opera.com
25 matches
Mail list logo
