On 2013-08-28 17:48, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Hi WebApps WG,
>
> The Media Capture Task Force (responsible for specs that deal with
> MediaStream objects [1]) has been considering whether one should be able
> to assign a MediaStream to and elements via an URL
> obtained via createObject
On 2013-09-02 01:44, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 1:14 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> <mailto:stefan.lk.hakans...@ericsson.com>> wrote:
>
> One need I can see is when you want to display the video in another
> window. Let's say you
On 2013-09-03 01:29, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly,
> what are the use-cases where they cannot be made the same by the developer?
E.g. the main page delegating communication to someone else (perhaps via
an iFrame). If the MediaStre
On 2013-09-03 12:01, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 10:27 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
>> On 2013-09-03 01:29, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>>> What are your use-cases where they're not the same? More importantly,
>>> what are the use-cases wher
On 2013-09-03 14:02, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Håkansson LK
> wrote:
>> I think it should stop playing since the object srcObject references is
>> gone. (It would work differently with createObjecURL + myVideoTag.src
>> since that w
On 10/18/13 6:57 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
> Should this not be synchronized with the Streams API? Please see recent
> evolutions [1] and thread [2] (where WebRTC streams are mentioned)
I think we're talking about completely different streams, and what Adam
is proposing is applicable for MediaStre
Dear Web Applications Working Group,
The WebRTC Working Group is working toward publishing the WebRTC 1.0
specification to Candidate Recommendation and is thus seeking review
from a variety of groups on the document:
http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/
We are particularly interested on feedback on
Hi all,
some of you may remember that Ericsson when joining the WebApps WG made a
reference to patents US 6,321,250, EP1310114 and PCT/EP2008/064352 (not yet
published). Someone may have assumed Ericsson would disclose or even exclude
from W3C RF licensing as defined in the W3 Patent Policy som
