I'd like to hear from the WG if the following use cases or issues have been
discussed before.
1) When onreadystatechange is invoked as new response data is being
received, currently there is no way to clear any buffered responseText
(alike) that has already been consumed. The lack of such a
Sorry, the API for 2) should read: SendPartialRequest().
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote:
I'd like to hear from the WG if the following use cases or issues have been
discussed before.
1) When onreadystatechange is invoked as new response data is being
:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote:
I'd like to hear from the WG if the following use cases or issues have
been
discussed before.
1) When onreadystatechange is invoked as new response data is being
received, currently there is no way to clear any buffered
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
A while ago sicking proposed adding chunked support to XMLHttpRequest:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-webapps/**
2011JulSep/0741.htmlhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JulSep/0741.html
One use case that we have which is not currently handled by XMLHttpRequest
is incrementally sending data that takes a long time to generate _from the
client to the server_. For example, if we were to record data from a
microphone, we couldn't upload it in real time to the server with the
current
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On Dec 8, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
ch...@jumis.com wrote:
**
I think the Web Sockets spec is intended for client
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Is there a reason not to add chunked-text and chunked-arraybuffer
to the
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Wenbo Zhu wen...@google.com wrote:
Yes, this will be the desired behavior.
Can I take this as Chrome being interested in implementing the chunked
proposal as well?
Will have to get back
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
From: annevankeste...@gmail.com [mailto:annevankeste...@gmail.com]
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Travis Leithead
travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote:
In my observation of the current IE behavior,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:53 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nlwrote:
The advantage the Streams API seems to have over moz-blob is that you
do not need to create a new object to read from each time there's
fresh data.
10 matches
Mail list logo