Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging; deadline March 28

2015-03-25 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
on 25/03/2015 03:52, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: Hi, if it helps, Blink now passes those two failing tests; Chrome canary/nightly builds have the fixes included. (Fixes for http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/{008,009}.html should appear overnight also.) hth --sigbjorn Thank

A Second Edition of Web Storage? [was: Re: Web Storage Rec errata?]

2015-05-08 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
Thanks for bringing this up, Anssi. The diff between the REC and the latest Editor’s Draft[1] indicated at least two normative changes, so I’d like to propose a second edition of Web Storage. What do you say? Here’s my analysis for the current mutex. All your comments are welcome. * ED L174,

Re: CfC: Moving webstorage to REC 2nd Edition; deadline May 21

2015-05-28 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
Hi Art, and all, I believe we have enough review on the current editor's draft to publish directly a CR. We don't need to do the extra WD step. If implementors or others have additional comments, they can do so during the CR phase. So I propose that we publish a CR directly. Thanks. —

Re: [admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated]

2015-07-01 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
On 1 Jul, 2015, at 1:30 pm, Hayato Ito hay...@google.com wrote: Thank you. I appreciate that. Then, let me migrate all open bugs of 'Component Model'. I think that include also HTML Imports bugs in addition to Custom Elements bugs. When I finish, I'll announce that. SGTM. Please go

Re: [admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated]

2015-07-06 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/commit/54434ada278440999649915b00772b6e96e57d4d On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM Xiaoqian Wu xiaoq...@w3.org mailto:xiaoq...@w3.org wrote: On 1 Jul, 2015, at 1:30 pm, Hayato Ito hay...@google.com mailto:hay...@google.com wrote: Thank you. I

Re: [admin] Moving Custom Elements bugs to Github [Was: Re: Custom Elements bugs will be also migrated]

2015-06-30 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
Hi Hayato, public-webapps has been removed from the default CC list of ‘Component Model’. Please let us know when you finish migrating and we will recover this component ASAP. Thanks. — xiaoqian On 29 Jun, 2015, at 10:42 pm, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote: Yves, Xiaoqian,

PSA: Change the Latest Editor's Drafts of WebStorage, WebWorkers, WebMessaging, Server-Sent Events and WebSockets

2015-10-19 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
Hi All, The Web Platform WG intents to update the Latest Editor's Drafts of a set of HTML5 API specs, including WebStorage, WebWorkers, WebMessaging, Server-Sent Events and WebSockets. As no one in WPWG has committed to work on these specs, the latest EDs will be the WHATWG version. Please

CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Storage 2nd Edition; deadline October 27

2015-10-20 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed Recommendation of Web Storage (Second Edition) using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement with this CfC means you consider the test results shows interoperability and the changes since CR are not substantive. The test results for Web Storage

Re: PSA: Change the Latest Editor's Drafts of WebStorage, WebWorkers, WebMessaging, Server-Sent Events and WebSockets

2015-10-20 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
> On 21 Oct, 2015, at 1:52 am, Arthur Barstow <art.bars...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 10/19/15 1:52 PM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: >> The Web Platform WG intents to update the Latest Editor's Drafts of a set of >> HTML5 API specs, including WebStorage, WebWorkers, WebMessag

Minutes from WebApps + HTMLWG Editing Task Force face to face meeting

2015-08-25 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
Hi folks, The minutes of the August 23-24 Editing Task Force f2f meeting are available as: * http://www.w3.org/2015/08/23-webapps-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2015/08/23-webapps-minutes.html * http://www.w3.org/2015/08/24-webapps-minutes.html http://www.w3.org/2015/08/24-webapps-minutes.html

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
> On 22 Sep, 2015, at 1:35 am, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> On 9/21/15 5:54 AM, Ms2ger wrote: >>> Why? >> >> I think the rationale was mentioned in >>

Re: Normative references to Workers.

2015-09-21 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
> On 16 Sep, 2015, at 8:17 pm, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > On 9/16/15 4:47 AM, Mike West wrote: >> Note that this is an issue that's going to come up for a number of WebAppSec >> specs (see >> https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#issue-a30f61b8 >>

Re: CfC: Is Web Workers Ready for CR? deadline Dec 14

2015-11-30 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
> On 30 Nov 2015, at 10:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > > On 11/30/15 8:31 AM, Xiaoqian Wu wrote: >> The latest [TEST RESULTS] of Web Workers indicate that Dedicated Workers >> have been widely implemented by the major browser vendors. >

CfC: Is Web Workers Ready for CR? deadline Dec 14

2015-11-30 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
This is a call for comments regarding the next step of Web Workers. The latest [TEST RESULTS] of Web Workers indicate that Dedicated Workers have been widely implemented by the major browser vendors. [Diff] between the latest W3C WD and the WHATWG living standard suggests substantial changes

Re: Apple will host Re: Custom Elements meeting will be 25th Jan (not 29th)

2016-01-19 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
Hi Kochi, and all, The remote participation information of the 25th Jan Web Components meeting is available: https://github.com/w3c/WebPlatformWG/blob/gh-pages/meetings/25janWC.md#logistics - VoIP: Join WebEx

Re: Telecon / meeting on first week of April for Web Components

2016-04-05 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
> On 6 Apr 2016, at 12:29 AM, Jan Miksovsky wrote: > > I’m unfamiliar with WebEx. If Chaals or someone wants to make a strong push > to use that, please set up the call and send out instructions for joining. We’ve scheduled a WebEx call for this Telecon, in case you

CfC: Pointer Lock to Proposed Recommendation; deadline August 20

2016-08-13 Thread Xiaoqian Wu
Hello, Web Platform WG, This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Proposed Recommendation of Pointer Lock using the [PR] as the basis. Agreement with this CfC means you consider the test results shows interoperability and the changes since CR are not substantive. The test results for Pointer