Re: FileSystem compromise spec

2012-12-11 Thread Eric U
compromise spec On 11/15/12 7:39 PM, ext Eric U wrote: As discussed at TPAC, there's little support for the current FileSystem API, but some support for a new API, and I promised to put forth a compromise proposal. In order to do that, I'd like to hear 1) what kinds of changes would make

Re: FileSystem compromise spec

2012-11-30 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 11/15/12 7:39 PM, ext Eric U wrote: As discussed at TPAC, there's little support for the current FileSystem API, but some support for a new API, and I promised to put forth a compromise proposal. In order to do that, I'd like to hear 1) what kinds of changes would make it more popular; 2) who

RE: FileSystem compromise spec

2012-11-30 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
-Original Message- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.bars...@nokia.com] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 6:46 AM To: ext Eric U; Doug Schepers Cc: Web Applications Working Group WG Subject: Re: FileSystem compromise spec On 11/15/12 7:39 PM, ext Eric U wrote: As discussed at TPAC

FileSystem compromise spec

2012-11-15 Thread Eric U
As discussed at TPAC, there's little support for the current FileSystem API, but some support for a new API, and I promised to put forth a compromise proposal. In order to do that, I'd like to hear 1) what kinds of changes would make it more popular; 2) who I'm trying to convince. There are a