Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-25 Thread Léonie Watson
On 21/06/2016 13:14, Léonie Watson wrote: Important: This CFC is extended for 48 hours. Please provide comments by end of day on Thursday 23^rd June 2016. With thanks to those who responded, this CFC passes. We will begin the process of transitioning Pointer Lock to CR. Léonie. --

RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Léonie Watson
From: Léonie Watson [mailto:t...@tink.uk] Sent: 21 June 2016 11:18 Yes, CR requires at least two implementations in shipping browsers. Once Pointer Lock is at Recc, hopefully the Shadow DOM content will be stable enough to include in Pointer Lock next. Correction: A CR doesn’t require 2+

RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Léonie Watson
From: Takayoshi Kochi [mailto:ko...@google.com] “I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the intended change to the spec yet, and so it could be immature to include in a "CR". (Does CR require at least 2 implementors exist?)” Yes, CR requires at least

RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Léonie Watson
Important: This CFC is extended for 48 hours. Please provide comments by end of day on Thursday 23rd June 2016. From: Vincent Scheib [mailto:sch...@google.com] Sent: 21 June 2016 05:09 “I've discussed more with Xiaoqian and Léonie and support a CR now with this proposal: Move to a CR

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-21 Thread Takayoshi Kochi
I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the intended change to the spec yet, and so it could be immature to include in a "CR". (Does CR require at least 2 implementors exist?) On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Vincent Scheib wrote: > I've

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-20 Thread Vincent Scheib
I've discussed more with Xiaoqian and Léonie and support a CR now with this proposal: Move to a CR for the v1 Pointer Lock specification without Shadow DOM changes, and a note on accessibility. Implementations are nearly consistent for v1 and it can move to a published status sooner. We can

RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-17 Thread Léonie Watson
From: Vincent Scheib [mailto:sch...@google.com] Sent: 16 June 2016 12:34 “An accessibility review and handling of this [accessibility issue #1] are still needed and will likely cause a CR cycle. To avoid unnecessary work I propose CR to be deferred until that work is complete.” I

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-16 Thread Takayoshi Kochi
I'm working on updating text to incorporate Shadow DOM in pointer lock spec. https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/192 On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Vincent Scheib wrote: > Shadow dom concepts will also be incorporated. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Chaals

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-16 Thread Vincent Scheib
Shadow dom concepts will also be incorporated. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Chaals McCathie Nevile < cha...@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:33:30 +0200, Vincent Scheib > wrote: > > An accessibility review and handling of this [accessibility issue #1] are

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-16 Thread Chaals McCathie Nevile
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:33:30 +0200, Vincent Scheib wrote: An accessibility review and handling of this [accessibility issue #1] are still needed and will likely cause a CR cycle. To avoid unnecessary work I propose CR to be deferred until that work is complete.

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-16 Thread Vincent Scheib
An accessibility review and handling of this [accessibility issue #1] are still needed and will likely cause a CR cycle. To avoid unnecessary work I propose CR to be deferred until that work is complete. [accessibility issue #1] https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/1 On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-14 Thread Dylan Barrell
abstain On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Michiel Bijl wrote: > Looks good, +1 > > —Michiel > > On 13 Jun 2016, at 18:12, Léonie Watson wrote: > > Hello WP, > > This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) to request that W3C republish Pointer > Lock as a Candidate

Re: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR

2016-06-14 Thread Michiel Bijl
Looks good, +1 —Michiel > On 13 Jun 2016, at 18:12, Léonie Watson wrote: > > Hello WP, > > This is a Call For Consensus (CFC) to request that W3C republish Pointer > Lock as a Candidate Recommendation (CR). Extensions to the MouseEventInit > Dictionary [1] constitute substantive