Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-05-30 Thread Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga
Hi Travis, on Tue, 29 May 2012 19:03:49 + Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: Based on #1, we can't simply replace the current timestamp property on DOM events with a high-resolution time stamp--this would be a change (though perhaps not very impactful) to backward

RE: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-05-29 Thread Travis Leithead
-Original Message- From: Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga [mailto:garai...@deusto.es] Hello, on Fri, 25 May 2012 16:49:25 -0700 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: This is not yet an official last call, but if you'd like to re-read the spec and provide additional

Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-05-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga [mailto:garai...@deusto.es] Hello, on Fri, 25 May 2012 16:49:25 -0700 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: This is not yet an official last

Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-05-29 Thread James Robinson
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga garai...@deusto.es wrote: Hello, on Fri, 25 May 2012 16:49:25 -0700 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: This is not yet an official last call, but if you'd like to re-read the spec and provide additional feedback--this is

Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-05-26 Thread Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga
Hello, on Fri, 25 May 2012 16:49:25 -0700 Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote: This is not yet an official last call, but if you'd like to re-read the spec and provide additional feedback--this is a good time to do it. Disclaimer: I don't know how and where to do this proposal. I hope

RE: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-05-25 Thread Travis Leithead
-Original Message- From: Travis Leithead Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 3:31 PM Hey folks, I'm joining Jacob Rossi to help work on editing the DOM L3 Events spec; I have some time to address some of the editorial last call comments, and I hope to move through them all pretty

Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-05-25 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Travis Leithead Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2012 3:31 PM Hey folks, I'm joining Jacob Rossi to help work on editing the DOM L3 Events spec; I have some time to address some

Re: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-03-09 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:30:34 +0100, Travis Leithead travis.leith...@microsoft.com wrote: I know there are a variety of opinions out there regarding the DOM L3 Events spec, and what should be done with it. I'm going to start with the basis that it's a good spec. It provides a great deal of

RE: DOM3 Events - additional editing help to move the spec forward

2012-03-09 Thread Travis Leithead
-Original Message- From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:ann...@opera.com] It [DOM3 Events] also describes basic concepts such as default actions and their effect on cancelable events, trusted events, etc., for which having a central reference is quite informative. Except the way it talks