On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:13:50 +0200, Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for the information Jonas.
Anne - Jonas indicates #26, #29, #31 and #32 have been addressed in the
latest Editor's Draft. Thus an implication they can be closed. Do you
agree they have been addressed and
Jonas Sicking wrote:
* ISSUE-30 Should spec have wording to recognise that User Agents may
implement further security beyond the spec?
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/30
I guess this is the part that needs to be addressed by adding wording to
the spec to say that the cache can
Arthur Barstow wrote:
The following issues were created during the July 1-2 f2f meeting
(minutes at [1], [2], respectively).
Would someone that attended that meeting please elaborate these issues?
In particular, has the Issue been addressed and thus can be proposed to
be Closed?
