Re: Where to discuss TR process issues? [Was: Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-09 Thread Charles McCathieNevile
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:50:48 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR process type discussions to another Public list. I'm

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-08 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 7/6/11 5:49 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: Do you oppose others submitting fixes to your spec bugs? If someone is interested in submitting fixes, they are welcome to contact me, so that I can work with them to work out how we can get something set up.

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-06 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:16:55 +0200, Daniel Veditz dved...@mozilla.com wrote: The fix for the spec would be to drop the line Once the end of the file is reached, the user agent must dispatch the event one final time, as defined below. For clarity something explicit could be added If

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
Thanks Anne and Dan. I added your comments to bug 13071. All - in addition to 13071, on July 6, Anne submitted 13155 and 13156 against this spec. Unless I hear otherwise, I assume the group wants to block LC until all of these bugs are addressed. As always, patches/fixes for open bugs are

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be addressed before publishing a new LCWD? Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the prioritisation of the bug

Where to discuss TR process issues? [Was: Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-06 Thread Arthur Barstow
Hi Hixie, On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be addressed before publishing a new LCWD? Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the prioritisation of

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: Do you oppose others submitting fixes to your spec bugs? If someone is interested in submitting fixes, they are welcome to contact me, so that I can work with them to work out how we can get something set up. There are a number of people who have

Re: Where to discuss TR process issues? [Was: Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR process type discussions to another Public list. I'm not asking to have a discussion about it at all; I'm asking that you

Re: Where to discuss TR process issues? [Was: Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-06 Thread Ian Jacobs
On 6 Jul 2011, at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: Hi Hixie, On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be addressed before publishing a new LCWD? Can we please stop letting the

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-05 Thread Arthur Barstow
Since this thread was started, bug 13071 was filed against this spec (the only open bug): http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13071 Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be addressed before publishing a new LCWD? Hixie - would you please provide a

Re: [eventsource] Is Server-Sent Events ready for LC? ; deadline July 1

2011-07-05 Thread Daniel Veditz
FWIW I'm going to push for the Mozilla implementation to dispatch only when an event is clearly terminated with a blank line (I filed the bug). If EOF is encountered w/out a blank line it should be considered an incomplete/corrupted event. The fix for the spec would be to drop the line Once