Oops, found that you were already there :)
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=393490#c15
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Takayoshi Kochi (河内 隆仁) ko...@google.com
wrote:
Sorry for coming late, but
- crbug.com/393490 Before and After pseudo elements don't work in
ShadowRoots
Sorry for coming late, but
- crbug.com/393490 Before and After pseudo elements don't work in
ShadowRoots (with :host styles)
- crbug.com/393509 :host()::before or :host()::after should work
have the relevant discussion about the current implementation in Blink (#2).
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:16
All right, sounds pretty unanimous that #2 (current behavior) is what
we should go with. I'll clarify the Scoping spec. Thanks!
~TJ
#2 for sure
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015, 4:52 PM Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
I was recently pointed to this StackOverflow thread
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31094454/does-the-shadow-dom-replace-before-and-after/
which asks what happens to ::before and ::after on shadow
On 07/01/2015 02:48 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
I was recently pointed to this StackOverflow thread
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31094454/does-the-shadow-dom-replace-before-and-after/
which asks what happens to ::before and ::after on shadow hosts, as
it's not clear from the specs. I had to
::before and ::after are basically *siblings* of the shadow host,
That's not a correct sentence. ::before and ::after shouldn't be a siblings
of the shadow host.
I just wanted to say that #2 is the desired behavior.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:01 PM Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org wrote:
The
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org wrote:
::before and ::after are basically *siblings* of the shadow host,
That's not a correct sentence. ::before and ::after shouldn't be a
siblings of the shadow host.
I just wanted to say that #2 is the desired behavior.
The spec [1] also says:
::before
Represents a styleable child pseudo-element immediately before the
originating element’s actual content.
::after
Represents a styleable child pseudo-element immediately before the
originating element’s actual content.
It sounds to me that ::before and ::after
Yeah, ::before and ::after should be added as the children of the shadow
host in the composed tree, as a *pseudo* first child and a *pseudo* last
child.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:15 PM Elliott Sprehn espr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Hayato Ito hay...@chromium.org