On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiakm...@apple.com wrote:
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
FWIW, I came across two pieces about Oracle's open source licensing of
Berkeley DB that might help clear the air around the licensing issues.
First, Oracle's license
On Friday 2009-06-26 15:27 -0700, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
I understand the interest in using Berkeley DB in browsers provided
appropriate licensing freedom were available. I am beginning to
understand your concerns vis-à-vis Berkeley DB's license.
To be clear, I wasn't expressing any
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Nikunj R. Mehtanikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote:
FWIW, I came across two pieces about Oracle's open source licensing of
Berkeley DB that might help clear the air around the licensing issues.
First, Oracle's license [1] is word-for-word identical to the erstwhile
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:40 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2009-06-26 15:27 -0700, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
I understand the interest in using Berkeley DB in browsers provided
appropriate licensing freedom were available. I am beginning to
understand your concerns vis-à-vis Berkeley DB's
On Jun 26, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:40 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
On Friday 2009-06-26 15:27 -0700, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
I understand the interest in using Berkeley DB in browsers provided
appropriate licensing freedom were available. I am beginning
On Jun 26, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta wrote:
FWIW, I came across two pieces about Oracle's open source licensing
of Berkeley DB that might help clear the air around the licensing
issues.
First, Oracle's license [1] is word-for-word identical to the
erstwhile SleepyCat license
