On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:52:25 +0100, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
wrote:
As previously mentioned on [p-w], the test results for Web Messaging
[All] indicate significant interoperability with only two tests that
have less than two passes [2]. The two tests, including a short
Microsoft supports publishing this. Thanks to all involved!
-
Subject:CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of Web Messaging;
deadline March 28
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:51:45 -0400
From: Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com
To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org
As
on 25/03/2015 03:52, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
Hi,
if it helps, Blink now passes those two failing tests; Chrome
canary/nightly builds have the fixes included.
(Fixes for
http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/{008,009}.html
should appear overnight also.)
hth
--sigbjorn
Thank
On 3/24/15 3:52 PM, Sigbjorn Finne wrote:
Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv:
On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur
Barstowart.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
2.http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this
test
failure (which
Den 3/24/2015 20:37, Arthur Barstow skreiv:
On 3/21/15 1:27 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur
Barstowart.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
2.http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this
test
failure (which passes on IE) is considered an
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@gmail.com wrote:
2. http://www.w3c-test.org/webmessaging/without-ports/025.html; this test
failure (which passes on IE) is considered an implementation bug
(MessageChannel and MessagePort are supposed to be exposed to Worker) that
is
