Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

[Arthur Barstow]

On 11/7/14 11:46 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

this is a Call for Consensus to:

a) Publish a gutted WG Note of the spec (see [Draft-Note])


FYI, this WG Note has been published 
.

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

[chaals]

08.11.2014, 14:46, "Domenic Denicola" :
> From: cha...@yandex-team.ru [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru]
>>  That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails.
>
> I guess I was just inspired by Mike Smith earlier saying something along the 
> lines of "don't let past practice constrain your thinking as to what can be 
> done in this case," and was hopeful we could come to the even-more-optimal 
> solution.
>
> In any case, maybe we could also add  
> to this and previous drafts?

I'd object to doing that. While some search engines sometimes provide odd 
results for queries that match a series of drafts (I know, we're guilty of that 
too), overall I think it is helpful to be able to find oddities that were in a 
draft for a while. In particular it supports people doing a little bit of 
investigation on their own, rather than making it necessary to find someone who 
was around at the time and can give a clear and comprehensive explanation of 
how and why a decision was made.

Something that *would* make sense to me is to start adding schema.org metadata 
for documents. And checking that we can e.g. explain that some document is 
superseded by another one.

I'll go put my schema.org hat on and chase that down...

cheesr

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

RE: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

[Domenic Denicola]

From: cha...@yandex-team.ru [mailto:cha...@yandex-team.ru] 

> That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails.

I guess I was just inspired by Mike Smith earlier saying something along the 
lines of "don't let past practice constrain your thinking as to what can be 
done in this case," and was hopeful we could come to the even-more-optimal 
solution.

In any case, maybe we could also add  to 
this and previous drafts?

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

[Arthur Barstow]

On 11/7/14 1:05 PM, cha...@yandex-team.ru wrote:

07.11.2014, 18:28, "Domenic Denicola" :

  On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren  wrote:

  On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow  wrote:
  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html

  Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/?

Or better yet, just be a redirect to it, as was done with WHATWG's DOM Parsing 
spec to the W3C one?

That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails.

But yeah, a pointer is a pretty obvious thing to put in.


Yes, sorry, I meant to include that. I just checked in a patch that adds 
a reference and link for WebApps' XHRL1 spec and the WHATWG spec above. 
That patch add this info to the SotD section 
.


Currently, the Draft Note does not include Latest Editor's Draft data in 
its boilerplate. If we want to add that data, it's not clear if we want 
to add WebApps' ED and/or WHATWG's spec. Strong preferences?


-Thanks, AB

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

[chaals]

07.11.2014, 18:28, "Domenic Denicola" :
>>  On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren  wrote:
>>>  On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow  
>>> wrote:
>>>  https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html
>>  Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/?
>
> Or better yet, just be a redirect to it, as was done with WHATWG's DOM 
> Parsing spec to the W3C one?

That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails.

But yeah, a pointer is a pretty obvious thing to put in.

cheers

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

[Domenic Denicola]

> On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren  wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow  wrote:
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html
> 
> Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/?

Or better yet, just be a redirect to it, as was done with WHATWG's DOM Parsing 
spec to the W3C one?

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of XHR Level 2; deadline November 14

[Anne van Kesteren]

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow  wrote:
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html

Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/?


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/