Hi Krzysztof,
2008/11/3 Krzysztof Maczyński [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Marcos,
Sorry for the delay in replying. When you wrote to me on 14 October, I was in
the Near East with very occasional Internet access. I'll understand if at
this moment it's to late to give my input the full weight in your
Marcos,
Sorry for the delay in replying. When you wrote to me on 14 October, I was in
the Near East with very occasional Internet access. I'll understand if at this
moment it's to late to give my input the full weight in your process it could
have had if sent earlier. Anyway, here it goes:
2008/9/22 Marcos Caceres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok. I see your point. However, I'm not sure what I can do as vendors
won't budge on this issue for now. At the moment, ZIP serves the
purpose for widgets. But as they become more popular, the limitations
with Zip will quickly be exposed. Zip will
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:02 PM, timeless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/22 Marcos Caceres [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok. I see your point. However, I'm not sure what I can do as vendors
won't budge on this issue for now. At the moment, ZIP serves the
purpose for widgets. But as they become more
Hi, Krzysztof.
Thanks again for this third round feedback. Some minor things I would
like your approval on below.
2008/9/20 Krzysztof Maczyński [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dear Marcos and other WG Members,
I can see you've published another LCWD. As Anne van Kesteren wrote earlier
this month, a WD
Dear Marcos and other WG Members,
I can see you've published another LCWD. As Anne van Kesteren wrote earlier
this month, a WD gives more incentive for feedback; I believe people tend to
think (at least subconsciously) of editors' drafts as something likely to be
used as their personal
Hi, Krzysztof.
Apologies for the delay in response (and for the length that this
email has grown to!). I believe I have managed to address all your
comments and integrated almost all of your new proposed text into the
Req doc. Note, however, I'm currently traveling so I've been unable to
check in
W dniu 15 sierpnia 2008 06:05 użytkownik Marcos Caceres
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
HI Krzysztof,
Just a friendly reminder that we (WebApps) are waiting for you to
respond to the LC comments. Can you please let me know either way if
you are planning to respond or not. If you are, I would really
Hi Krzysztof,
I've made most of the changes you recommended but I was not able to
resolve everything. Please see below. I would really appreciate if you
could take the time to help me resolve outstanding issues. However, if
you are happy with leaving things as they are, please let me know so I
Hi Stuart, All,
This email is a continuation of the discussion about the Widget URI
scheme we've had in the past [1]. WebApps is trying to draft the final
text for the Widget Requirements document regarding a URI scheme for
widgets and we would again appreciate some input from the TAG. WebApps
WG
10 matches
Mail list logo
