Re: Components F2F

2015-07-08 Thread Michael[tm] Smith
Hi Mark,

Mark Giffin , 2015-07-07 23:17 -0700:
> Archived-At: 
> 
> Dimitri, this page says the F2F is on Monday July 21, but July 21 is a
> Tuesday. Is July 21 the correct date?

Yeah, July 21 is the correct date. I changed that wiki page to indicate
it’s a Tuesday rather than a Monday.

  —Mike

> On 7/7/2015 11:23 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> >Hi folks!
> >
> >I just updated the meeting wiki [1] with the meeting location information.
> >tl;dr: it's the same room that we had in April.
> >
> >[1]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebComponentsJuly2015Meeting

-- 
Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Components F2F

2015-07-07 Thread Mark Giffin
Dimitri, this page says the F2F is on Monday July 21, but July 21 is a 
Tuesday. Is July 21 the correct date?


Mark

On 7/7/2015 11:23 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:

Hi folks!

I just updated the meeting wiki [1] with the meeting location 
information. tl;dr: it's the same room that we had in April.


[1]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebComponentsJuly2015Meeting

:DG<


On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:01 AM, > wrote:


Google had offered to host the meeting, and I believe they are on it.

Obviously, offers to share the hosting effort are welcome in
general. I haven't checked but agree that based on last time 22
might be squeezing it.

cheers

02.07.2015, 09:11, "Anne van Kesteren" mailto:ann...@annevk.nl>>:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa mailto:rn...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>  Is Google hosting this meeting as well? Alternatively, would
other browser vendors (e.g. Mozilla) willing to host it this time?
>
> If we decide quickly it seems I can reserve a room at Mozilla for 18
> people in SF, maybe 22 in MTV. Not sure that's big enough
judging from
> last meeting, but I don't have the details.
>
>>  I'm supposed to write up a document that summaries what we've
agreed thus far. I've been busy with other stuff lately but will
try to post it before the meeting.
>
> Excellent!
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
cha...@yandex-team.ru  - - - Find
more at http://yandex.com






Re: Components F2F

2015-07-07 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Hi folks!

I just updated the meeting wiki [1] with the meeting location information.
tl;dr: it's the same room that we had in April.

[1]: https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebComponentsJuly2015Meeting

:DG<


On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:01 AM,  wrote:

> Google had offered to host the meeting, and I believe they are on it.
>
> Obviously, offers to share the hosting effort are welcome in general. I
> haven't checked but agree that based on last time 22 might be squeezing it.
>
> cheers
>
> 02.07.2015, 09:11, "Anne van Kesteren" :
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa  wrote:
> >>  Is Google hosting this meeting as well? Alternatively, would other
> browser vendors (e.g. Mozilla) willing to host it this time?
> >
> > If we decide quickly it seems I can reserve a room at Mozilla for 18
> > people in SF, maybe 22 in MTV. Not sure that's big enough judging from
> > last meeting, but I don't have the details.
> >
> >>  I'm supposed to write up a document that summaries what we've agreed
> thus far. I've been busy with other stuff lately but will try to post it
> before the meeting.
> >
> > Excellent!
> >
> > --
> > https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
>


Re: Components F2F

2015-07-02 Thread chaals
Google had offered to host the meeting, and I believe they are on it.

Obviously, offers to share the hosting effort are welcome in general. I haven't 
checked but agree that based on last time 22 might be squeezing it.

cheers

02.07.2015, 09:11, "Anne van Kesteren" :
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa  wrote:
>>  Is Google hosting this meeting as well? Alternatively, would other browser 
>> vendors (e.g. Mozilla) willing to host it this time?
>
> If we decide quickly it seems I can reserve a room at Mozilla for 18
> people in SF, maybe 22 in MTV. Not sure that's big enough judging from
> last meeting, but I don't have the details.
>
>>  I'm supposed to write up a document that summaries what we've agreed thus 
>> far. I've been busy with other stuff lately but will try to post it before 
>> the meeting.
>
> Excellent!
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
cha...@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com



Re: Components F2F

2015-07-02 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ryosuke Niwa  wrote:
> Is Google hosting this meeting as well?  Alternatively, would other browser 
> vendors (e.g. Mozilla) willing to host it this time?

If we decide quickly it seems I can reserve a room at Mozilla for 18
people in SF, maybe 22 in MTV. Not sure that's big enough judging from
last meeting, but I don't have the details.


> I'm supposed to write up a document that summaries what we've agreed thus 
> far.  I've been busy with other stuff lately but will try to post it before 
> the meeting.

Excellent!


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/



Re: Components F2F

2015-07-01 Thread Ryosuke Niwa

> On Jun 30, 2015, at 2:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren  wrote:
> 
> Can someone update
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/WebComponentsJuly2015Meeting with a
> bit more information? I hear it might be in Mountain View?

Is Google hosting this meeting as well?  Alternatively, would other browser 
vendors (e.g. Mozilla) willing to host it this time?

Unfortunately, it's going to be really hard to reserve a big enough room at 
Apple :(  I'm hoping that'll change once we move to the new spaceship but we'll 
see...

> Will we have sufficient time to cover both Custom Elements and Shadow
> DOM? And could the drafts maybe be updated to cover what has been
> agreed to so far? E.g. it seems we have agreement on slots and I think
> that was the last major thing from Shadow DOM that needed a solution.
> Would be great if we could review a complete document.

I'm supposed to write up a document that summaries what we've agreed thus far.  
I've been busy with other stuff lately but will try to post it before the 
meeting.

- R. Niwa