Thanks!
The issue is still there.
Actually for mousewheel, wheel and textInput as I can see.
Another issue related to DOM3EV:
There seems to be no naming convention for the events. We have
DOMSubtreeModified, mousewheel, keyup, textInput and so on.
Is it related to the history that CamelCase is used only partially (it seems it
is not used only for DOM2EVs)?
Thanks,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
-Original Message-
From: Olli Pettay [mailto:olli.pet...@helsinki.fi]
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik
Cc: www-...@w3.org; public-webapps@w3.org
Subject: Re: DOM3EV: [ViewModes] typeArg on initXXXEvent
FYI, the current draft is here
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html
On 8/24/09 6:42 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:
Hi,
In the ViewModes specification [1] we define a few new events.
All the initXXXEvent methods have currently typeArg parameter.
I think they are superfluous, but they seem to mimic what is defined in
DOM2Events and DOM3Events.
The problem is that in DOM2Events and DOM3Event the initXXXEvent methods are
for groups of lower level events, like UIEvent (DOMActivate, DOMFocusIn
etc.), KeyboardEvent (keydown, keyup), MouseEvent (click, dblclick, mousedown
etc.) etc.
However, e.g. DOM3Events' MouseWheelEvent [2] has only 1 possible value for
typeArg, namely mousewheel [3] (if I read current version of the
specification correctly).
So the question arises whether typeArg is required for MouseWheelEvent?
What happens the typeArg passed is not mousewheel?
Then you create some other event which type is not mousewheel but which
implements the interface. That is how event interfaces work.
-Olli
Could we have latest Web IDL for DOM3Events with related raises?
Once we have the answer to the above questions, I assume the ViewModes
specification will follow.
As for me for the events specified in the current pre-FPWD document do not
need typeArg, since it just unnecessarily doubles the information in the
method invocation.
What do you think?
Thanks.
Kind regards,
Marcin
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vm/Overview.src.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/events.html#Events-MouseWheelEvent
[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/events.html#event-mousewheel
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanc...@access-company.com
Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5 | D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
www.access-company.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is
privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by
responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5 | D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
www.access-company.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is
privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by
responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
