On Feb 20, 2014, at 6:29 PM, Hajime Morrita morr...@google.com wrote:
Firefox has already shipped style scoped without Shadow DOM and I guess
there is no dependency from scoped style to shadow DOM as the former is done
before the later is started.
Looks like Firefox supports it since 21.
WebKit situation was similar. style scoped was done before Shadow DOM, and
style scoping for Shadow DOM was done on top of style scoped internals.
There was no dependency from style scoped to Shadow DOM. And it seems both
style scoped and non-builtin part of Shadow DOM was removed since then.
In Blink, Shadow DOM styling and style scoped kind of share the underlying
plumbing. But it is more like that both depend on same lower-level mechanism
for style scoping of DOM subtree. There is no direct dependency between both.
I had an impression that scoped style element was removed in Blink per
discussion here:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/blink-dev/JB8nFQXhAuQ/q_yIqFFEUVkJ
But I guess nobody proceeded to do so?
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink/+/master/Source/core/html/HTMLStyleElement.cpp
- R. Niwa
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Erik Bryn e...@erikbryn.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
First time caller, long time listener.
From what I understand, the browser vendors seem to be bundling style
scoped with the Shadow DOM spec. I'd like to start a discussion around
decoupling the two and asking that vendors prioritize shipping style scoped
over Shadow DOM as a whole. As a web developer and JS framework author, the
single most important feature that I could use immediately and I believe is
totally uncontroversial is style scoped.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
- Erik
--
morrita
