Re: Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept]

2015-02-19 Thread Arthur Barstow

On 2/19/15 9:57 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:
Where are you supposed to propose new APIs?  Can such proposal be made 
by non-W3C members?
This was a proposal for using Chrome Native Messaging as the 
foundation for a new standard.


Perhaps you should pursue the Community Group process 
https://www.w3.org/community/groups/.


-Thanks, AB





Re: Staying on Topic [Was: Re: WebPortable/PlatformProprietary - An Established Concept]

2015-02-19 Thread Anders Rundgren

On 2015-02-19 15:47, Arthur Barstow wrote:

On 2/19/15 9:35 AM, Anders Rundgren wrote:

Hi Anders,


Hi Art,



In the spirit of restricting postings on this list to the group's
chartered scope ...


http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/

This work will include both documenting existing APIs such as XMLHttpRequest
 and developing new APIs in order to enable richer web applications

Where are you supposed to propose new APIs?  Can such proposal be made by 
non-W3C members?
This was a proposal for using Chrome Native Messaging as the foundation for a 
new standard.

Cheers
Anders



I don't see a clear and direct connection between your posting [1] and
WebApps' chartered scope [2]. If I missed such a connection, please
focus your related postings to a specific spec and use the spec's
short-name as the Subject: prefix (f.ex. for the Manifest spec use
[appmanifest] ...).

-Thanks, AB

[1]
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015JanMar/0685.html
[2] https://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus