On 14/01/17 00:12, Kirk Hall wrote: > I would support this. > > Can we wait to start a new Ballot adding back Methods 1 and 8 to BR > 22.214.171.124 until we have adopted clarifying changes to our Bylaws > (Ballot 183) that will apply to new ballots amending Final Guidelines > (here, amending the BRs)?
On 13/01/17 22:32, Steve Medin wrote: > Pending questions handled by an explanatory new angle. Since EV > Certificate Approvers and their non-EV counterparts are implemented > in Enterprise RA accounts as 2FA-credentialed issuance portal > administrators with access to a pre-vetted collection of
On 13/01/17 22:22, Virginia Fournier wrote: > * In 2.2 f), you have changed "adopted" to "approved". Given that the > notion of "approval" has a special meaning in the IPR Policy, and AIUI > we want it to mean the point _after_ the IPR review finishes (assuming > no disclosures), could this change